Talk:Seeley G. Mudd Chemistry Building

Seeley G. Mudd Chemistry Building has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 4, 2015. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Seeley G. Mudd Chemistry Building appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 November 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that although the Seeley G. Mudd Chemistry Building is Vassar College's youngest completed academic building, it is slated for demolition in 2016?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Seeley G. Mudd Chemistry Building.

Wikipedia

New York (state): Hudson Valley

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Hudson Valley (assessed as Low-importance).

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Seeley G. Mudd Chemistry Building/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Maile66 (talk · contribs) 23:25, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
Both Duplication Detector and Earwig used

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Everything looks in line with MOS.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
Good detail on funding, construction and architectural aspects

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Bobamnertiopsis is the primary editor. Only minor edits by others.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
All images are on Commons and appropriately licensed.

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Good used of images, captions and placing within the article.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Somewhat surprised this fell through the cracks and lingered at GA nominations for the last 4 months. Nicely done article on this historical building at Vassar College. Good job. — Maile (talk) 23:48, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference, for future reference

Vassar Quarterly