Talk:Secular liberalism

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 February 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Secular liberalism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Philosophy: Social and political / Religion Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy
	Philosophy of religion

Politics High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Problematic coverage

The article has a number of issues including the lack of good sources: it would be better if we could have coverage from some kind of text on political philosophy or political theory or ideology. It seems very narrowly restricted to British and American sources. The terms of political discussion are much different in a country like France. I can't quite put my finger on what is wrong with this article, but there is much that needs fixing. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:58, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added some discussion about the state of secular liberalism in France. I hope you like it. GVnayR (talk) 23:48, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thematic Approach

As I said in the AfD discussion, this topic currently lacks salient points of secular liberalism (henceforth ScL). We're relegating the topic itself to the introduction; the bulk of the article discusses periphery topics surrounding ScL. Lets tackle this thematically and give it a proper treatment.Bunston (talk) 06:40, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Beliefs section

I'm not sure I understood much of what was being conveyed in the Beliefs section and how it is directly tied to liberal secularism. Requires clarification. 24.200.87.51 (talk) 20:52, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]