Talk:Second Skin (song)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Requested move
[edit]- Second Skin Single → ? — Please see comment in discussion — Lox (t,c) 09:34, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support move to Second Skin (song) since I am unable to find guidelines on how singles should be disambiguated. I will happily reconsider to any other suggestsions --Lox (t,c) 09:39, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support move to Second Skin (song). TJ Spyke 08:28, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Comment This page move was originally suggested by an anonymous user[1] to Second Skin (The Gits song). I am listing this at WP:RM for discussion --Lox (t,c) 09:37, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
- Including the artists name is usually only done if there is more than one song (that has an article) with the same title. Song title disambiguation goes like this: 1)Song name 2)Song name with (song) if it's not the only article with that name 3)Song name with (artist song) if there is more than 1 song with the same name and they each have articles. TJ Spyke 08:28, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, I assumed it was something like that but wasn't sure! --Lox (t,c) 11:24, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- This page has been moved as the result of a proposal listed at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Dekimasuよ! 06:18, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, I assumed it was something like that but wasn't sure! --Lox (t,c) 11:24, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Including the artists name is usually only done if there is more than one song (that has an article) with the same title. Song title disambiguation goes like this: 1)Song name 2)Song name with (song) if it's not the only article with that name 3)Song name with (artist song) if there is more than 1 song with the same name and they each have articles. TJ Spyke 08:28, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:SecondSkinFront.gif
[edit]Image:SecondSkinFront.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.