Talk:Second Disraeli ministry

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Second Disraeli ministry article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

References

This article has been tagged as requiring references or citations. It does not, according to the general rules of research, require a citation, as it states universally verifiable historical data. That is, there is no contrary position that could challenge the information except in the event that the information given is factually incorrect. This stipulation is not rectified by offering additional or "more correct" citations, but rather by merely changing the information given to reflect reality. Basically, it is not appropriate to cite scholarly works on information regarding names, dates, who filled what office and when, etc.--this is in fact a poor and amaterish form of writing. It is seriously recommended that the tag for this article lacking references be removed by an editor. --Lrschum (talk) 20:13, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have resolved this issue as part of a merger. The consistent usage plan for British ministries articles is now set forth at Talk:List of British governments. RGloucester (talk) 22:42, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]