Talk:Deep water source cooling

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Deep water source cooling article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Climate change Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Use in medium ponds

I was wondering whether DWSC is also possible with medium ponds (eg of 2m-3m depth). Aldough the temperature will be higher than 3-6°C, perhaps it would still be enough to circulate it inside a dwelling to cool it. It should be looked into the possibility of covering the pond with surface plants or sheeting to reduce solar radiation and thus warming. Another possibility is a subterranean water tank. Please look into it and add to article

Move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was Not moved. a merger was advised instead. Appropriate tages added to both articles.
— $V = I * R$ (talk) 09:19, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deep water source cooling → Deep water air cooling — Deep water air cooling is a much more correct term as it is air which is cooled (trough water). The Air cooling article states this (from Merriam Webster dictionary) —Preceding unsigned comment added by KVDP (talk • contribs) 09:50, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Geothermal heat pump which already covers this topic. The main issue is the technology. It is less important where the source for the temperature exchange is located. If kept it probably should be at the more common name from the existing article of water-source heat pumps. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:49, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Concur. — $V = I * R$ (talk) 23:15, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Trainwreck. This vote has approved the move, but the discussion at Talk:Geothermal heat pump#Suggested merge has rejected the move. Can we talk about this instead of just voting? Wikipedia is not a democracy.--Yannick (talk) 11:52, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from Deep lake water cooling

In August 2009, User:KVDP had proposed that Deep lake water cooling to be merged into this article. Rehman⁽⁺⁾ 09:03, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support: This article is small enough to support a full merge. Rehman⁽⁺⁾ 09:03, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support One article can easily accommodate freshwater and seawater sources.--Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:34, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- bad idea, any topic worthy of a wikilink is worthy of a separate article. Clicking on a wikilink is easier than scrolling around within a larger omnibus article. In addition excessive merging also fundamentally undermines the power of a wiki as it erodes the usefulness of watchlists and the utility of the "what links here" button. Geo Swan (talk) 13:45, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - we ought to talk about one topic under one article title. I've merged the two parts and redirected the other title here. --Wtshymanski (talk) 20:37, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removed image

I've removed File:DeepWaterSourceCooling.svg from the article. Deep-water cooling uses naturally-cold water from the lower regions of a large body of water as the heat sink; the image appears to depict using a buried container as a low-efficiency radiator instead. --Carnildo (talk) 00:10, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://energyandsustainability.fs.cornell.edu/util/cooling/production/lsc/works.cfm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 00:17, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Deep water source cooling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:14, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]