Talk:Sea Launch

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Spaceflight Mid‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Norway Start‑class

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Russia: Technology & engineering / Economy Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the economy of Russia task force.

Question

The following question was added to the main page by someone. I have removed it and am putting here on the discussion page where it belongs:

"(should this should be moved into entry dedicated to discussion of space-launches?)"

The question was placed in and refers to the section entitled "Advantages of equatorial ocean-platform based launches"

Jafafa Hots 16:46, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also~how much does it cost to deliver one load in to orbit? What is the maximum altitude of this system for a typical load? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.234.149.2 (talk) 19:09, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From the ashes

Before its extensive re-engineering, the Ocean Odyssey launch platform was originally the Piper Alpha oil drilling platform which suffered from a devastating disaster in July 1988 in which 167 men were killed. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piper_Alpha

04:02, 15 February 2006 (UTC) —User:65.27.159.71

See Talk:Piper Alpha for discussion. —Fleminra 05:29, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note - According to Oleg Sukovoy, a worker on the conversion team, the Ocean Odyssey was the vessel which eventually became the Odyssey. The Piper Alpha disaster happened two months earlier. See: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/o.sukovoy/Sea%20Launch.htm

Here is a picture of the original Ocean Odyssey fire: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/o.sukovoy/Ocean%20Odyssey.htm

Weather advantages

I removed the statement about equatorial advantages: "Superior weather conditions, as the launch site is located in the "doldrums" with few storms and almost no lightning.". This is not true... the equator gets its share of storms and weather; see the article Intertropical Convergence Zone and any climate article on an equatorial locale like Geography and climate of Singapore. It is true that the equator is free from tropical cyclones, but even this is only a seasonal concern. -Rolypolyman 18:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Payload enclosures"

Under the ownership section the article states that Boeing is responsible for the payload "enclosures". Shouldn't this be "payload fairings"? Or is Boeing also responsible for other enclosures such as payloading shipping containers or processing facilities? If we're only talking about the "nosecone" of the rocket, then "payload fairings" is a more accurate description - Taka2007 21:07, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Out of date

This article is out of date. Anything new since 2010? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.102.102.5 (talk) 15:34, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.aerospace-technology.com/projects/sealaunch/
Triggered by \baerospace-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 09:17, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 19:48, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Share since 2010 - wrong source

Source linked under #Ownership and business table of shares, column Share (Since 2010) doesn't include information about percentage of shares provided in said column. SkywalkerPL (talk) 19:54, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is, and while it could potentially be organised a little better, it works well with the original shares column. Quote:

"Sea Launch emerged from bankruptcy in 2010. As part of the plan of reorganization, a subsidiary of RSC Energia increased its ownership to 95 percent from 25 percent, the lawsuit said. Boeing and Kvaerner, now called Aker Maritime Finance AS, split the remaining 5 percent."

— Huntster (t @ c) 06:08, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, thanks for clarification. I completely missed that. SkywalkerPL (talk) 08:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sea Launch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:48, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sea Launch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110629092525/http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/ic/sis/news/2005/q4/nr_051208s.html to http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/ic/sis/news/2005/q4/nr_051208s.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:27, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]