Talk:Scuba gas management

Section sizes

Section size for Scuba gas management (28 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	3,633	3,633
Gas planning	2,753	7,327
Rule of thumb gas planning	4,107	4,107
Rock bottom gas planning	467	467
Gas blending	1,586	1,586
Filling of cylinders	1,111	3,656
Filling from a compressor	1,715	1,715
Filling from high-pressure storage	830	830
Breathing gas analysis	2,157	2,157
Marking and identification of cylinders	1,272	1,272
Scuba configuration	1,668	1,668
Gas quantities for open circuit	279	5,714
Choice of gases	1,116	1,116
Gas quantities for the planned profile	702	702
Gas quantities for contingencies	1,548	1,548
Drop cylinders	1,594	1,594
Gas matching	475	475
Gas quantities for rebreathers	2,336	3,085
Rebreather bailout options	749	749
Storage and transportation of cylinders	81	2,680
Handling	713	713
Long-term storage	1,318	1,318
Transportation	568	568
Pre-dive checks	1,945	1,945
Monitoring gas during a dive	4,358	4,358
Gas switching	4,823	4,823
Emergency provision of gas	4,373	4,373
References	11,818	11,818
Total	60,095	60,095

Orphaned references in Scuba gas management

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Scuba gas management's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Mitchell":

From Hypercapnia: Mitchell, Simon. "Respiratory failure in technical diving". DAN Southern Africa. Archived from the original on 2021-11-13. Retrieved 6 October 2021 – via YouTube.
From Breathing gas: Mitchell, Simon (2015). "Respiratory failure in technical diving". www.youtube.com. DAN Southern Africa. Archived from the original on 2021-11-18. Retrieved 6 October 2021.
From Scuba gas planning: Mitchell, Simon (2015). "Respiratory failure in technical diving". www.youtube.com. DAN Southern Africa. Retrieved 6 October 2021.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:19, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Scuba gas management

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Scuba gas management's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "AAUS":

From Scuba gas planning: Standards for Scientific diving: Manual. Mobile, AL: American Academy of Underwater Sciences. 2019.
From Craig B. Cooper: Shepard, Andrew N.; Dinsmore, David A.; Miller, Steven L.; Cooper, Craig B.; Wicklund, Robert I. (1996). Lang, MA; Baldwin, CC (eds.). "Aquarius Undersea Laboratory: The Next Generation". The Diving for Science…1996, "Methods and Techniques of Underwater Research". Proceedings of the American Academy of Underwater Sciences (Sixteenth Annual Scientific Diving Symposium): 205–212. Archived from the original on March 6, 2010. Retrieved February 29, 2012.

Reference named "pmid21848111":

From Diving cylinder: Buzzacott P, Rosenberg M, Heyworth J, Pikora T (2011). "Risk factors for running low on gas in recreational divers in Western Australia". Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine. 41 (2). Melbourne, Victoria: SPUMS and EUBS: 85–9. PMID 21848111. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
From Scuba gas planning: Buzzacott, P.; Rosenberg, M.; Heyworth, J.; Pikora, T (2011). "Risk factors for running low on gas in recreational divers in Western Australia". Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine. 41 (2): 85–9. PMID 21848111. Retrieved 7 January 2016.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:05, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Scuba gas management

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Scuba gas management's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Bozanic1997":

From Rule of thirds (diving): Bozanic, JE (1997). "AAUS Standards for Scientific Diving Operations in Cave and Cavern Environments: A Proposal". In: SF Norton (ed). Diving for Science...1997. Proceedings of the American Academy of Underwater Sciences (17th Annual Scientific Diving Symposium). Retrieved 2008-07-05.
From Diving cylinder: Bozanic, JE (1997). Norton, SF (ed.). "AAUS Standards for Scientific Diving Operations in Cave and Cavern Environments: A Proposal". Diving for Science...1997. Proceedings of the American Academy of Underwater Sciences (17th Annual Scientific Diving Symposium). Dauphin Island, Alabama: AAUS. Retrieved 7 January 2016.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:04, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

B-class review

B	The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as `{{cite web}}` is optional. ~~last 3 sections still need inline refs. Nothing likely to be a problem or controversial, and largely common knowlegde in the field, but will take a bit of time to track them down.~~ All paragraphs now have at least one ref. Good enough for B-class Y The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. Probably fairly complete, nothing obvious missing. Y The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. Complies. Y The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. Good enough for B-class Y The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. Reaasonable number of relevant images. Y The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible. Some technical languge as it is a technical topic. Should be OK. If anyone wants something clarifies, just say so. Y

Not quite yet. · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 17:13, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting to B-class. · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 14:42, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Importance rating

I decided to move this up to top importance for Wikiproject:Underwater diving as it is critically important for safety. If anyone disagrees, ping me and we can discuss. · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 14:48, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]