Talk:Scream & Shout/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 19:15, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing. TB randley 19:15, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will you post the review soon or should I re-nominate it? - Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 15:07, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"some of whom" should be "some of which"
Fixed - Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 03:07, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"A Rap-Up reviewer wrote about the use of Auto-Tune on will.i.am's vocals" what did they state, can you elaborate on that?
The autor states, "The electro-dance record, which will appear on will’s upcoming album #willpower, features a robotic hook from Britney and Auto-Tuned vocals from will". I re-wrote the sentence but I'm not sure if it's clear still. Take a look. - Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 03:07, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Generally, About.com is not considered to be a reliable source and thus I would remove the review from their members.
The review is from Bill Lamb, a music journalist since 1999, who covers the Top 40 / Pop section of About.com, and has interviewed many celebrities for the site. Generally the site may not be considered reliable, but isn't this case reliable enough to be kept? - Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 03:07, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not use curly quotation marks, such as ’ or ”, and stick with the regular per MOS:QUOTE
"On January 1, 2013, will.i.am said that he would release a club remix of "Scream & Shout" featuring American rapper Waka Flocka Flame and producer Hit-Boy the same day" I do not understanding the meaning of "the same day", can it perhaps be removed?
Removed - Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 03:07, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TBrandley (T • C • B) 02:35, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In this case I think we could consider that review a reliable source given the above. Since everything else is addressed I'll pass the article. Wizardman 15:05, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]