Talk:Scott Barry

A fact from Scott Barry appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 September 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Triple-A fill-in umpire Scott Barry ejected three Major League Baseball All-Stars in one week between August 18 and August 25, 2010?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/September.

Wikipedia

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Baseball: Umpires Low‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Umpires task force (assessed as High-importance).

Referees High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Referees WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Referees. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.RefereesWikipedia:WikiProject RefereesTemplate:WikiProject RefereesReferees articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Vandalism

Stop it. If you want to add something to Barry's page, it must be sourced, must be neutrally worded and free from bias. All vandalism will be removed. RefereeOrganist (talk) 07:38, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What vandalism are you talking about? — KV5 • Talk • 22:04, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I cleaned it up. Previous vandalism, recently more of NPOV and unsourced editorial statements. Anticipate very few issues during the baseball offseason. RefereeOrganist (talk) 22:09, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

None of what you removed was "vandalism" and you removed cited content without any explanation. You should read up on what vandalism actually means. — KV5 • Talk • 22:19, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Was the content against policy? Yes. End of discussion. RefereeOrganist (talk) 22:21, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Um, no. You have not cited any policy of which this content was in contravention. Please elaborate in detail, using examples, instead of being dismissive and rude. — KV5 • Talk • 22:24, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As I stated, previous vandalism (see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scott_Barry&oldid=380958011), recently NPOV and unsourced material. RefereeOrganist (talk) 22:57, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, now I see the vandalism. I fail, in all of your changes, to see NPOV violations or removal of unsourced material. As I said above, you removed sourced material, which I restored. — KV5 • Talk • 11:29, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I reworded the Mike Winters replacement sentences. The previous phrasing implied cause-effect, I changed it to read more matter-of-fact. Let me know if you disagree RefereeOrganist (talk) 06:42, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]