User talk:RefereeOrganist

Welcome!

Hello, RefereeOrganist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Newyorkbrad (talk) 19:42, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jerry Layne edit

You mention in the Edit history of the Jerry Layne page to "not make baseless claims." The television broadcast is showing the location of the pitches and has shown that Jerry Layne has been calling many balls as strikes for Cardinals pitchers and strikes as balls for the Rangers pitchers. This is fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.222.155.221 (talk) 02:50, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that. I do not disagree with your assertion. However, if you make a claim, you must reference verifiable sources. If you hold on until the end of the game, I'll supply the page with specific numbers of pitches missed. As it stands right now, Layne has missed 15 calls, 13 have benefitted St. Louis while only two have benefitted Texas. SOURCE: http://umpireejections.blogspot.com/ . As long as you have a source/reference and write the piece from a neutral point of view, it will be fine. RefereeOrganist (talk) 02:55, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed line score, replacing dashes (-) with exes (X)?

Hi, just saw your comment in 2011 ALDS edit summary. However, I can't find such scoring notation in the MLB rule PDF. Can you show me where it is? Thanks~--NullSpace (talk) 06:10, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- Must be a supplementary style guide. RefereeOrganist (talk) 06:52, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Gibson October Edit

Your recent edit stated vandalism. I would like to know which seat you sat in during this issue, im not going to reverse it, thats your job, I have several people that heard this, present at the game. Myself also, If you would like to sensor the truth from people, thats your business, if you know this person just ask him to watch his language around children for me. --this is intended as a message to refreeorganist — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwren33 (talk • contribs) 21:01, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

–The edit reversed was at the least guilty of lacking neutrality (NPOV), at worst vandalism. Unfortunately, your description is unsourced and as a result an illegitimate accusation, which should not be placed on wikipedia. Had there been a news story about this and had it been a bigger issue, this would be a more appropriate addition, though the language would still have to be changed to convey a neutral viewpoint in factual reporting. RefereeOrganist (talk) 21:12, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct, more of a news story, and I am no writer. However, I witnessed it, the fan was out of line, I just dont appreciate the language used by the umpire. The reason I took my camera out and snapped the photo. I was shocked to see a professional umpire repsond to a fan in that manner, also these umpires have mics on them, so it is recorded also. I do understand your point, appreciate your swift response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.72.200.99 (talk) 21:56, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

An invitation for you!


	Hello, RefereeOrganist. We are pleased to invite you to join WikiProject Baseball's Umpires task force, a group dedicated to improving articles related to baseball umpires. If you're interested in participating, please add your name to the list of members on the task force page.

Happy editing! AutomaticStrikeout 18:28, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for joining! Welcome aboard! AutomaticStrikeout 19:47, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another Invitation

Automatic Strikeout and I have started a new sub-project off of the NFL Wiki-Project dedicated to referees. It can be found here. I know you helped out with the umpires task force a few months ago, so I thought it was worth a shot on this one. Feel free to jump in. Thanks for the consideration--Go Phightins! (talk) 20:57, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Umpire Barnstar
	For all your work on the umpire articles. AutomaticStrikeout 05:17, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012 National League Wild Card Game article undone revision

Hello, I'm curious as to why you undid my revision on the 2012 National League Wild Card Game page. I was trying to bring out that the commentators, with years of experience in baseball, a good view of the play, and definitely a good view of the replays, disagreed with the umpire's infield fly rule call in the bottom of the 8th inning. Thank you.

-The commentators' assessment of the play was factually incorrect and, as always, written material—especially opinions—must be sourced.RefereeOrganist (talk) 22:32, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. BULKBULKARD (talk) 18:09, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Greg Willard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:33, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Opting in to VisualEditor

As you may know, VisualEditor ("Edit ^beta") is currently available on the English Wikipedia only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 50 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to your preferences and choosing the item, "MediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-enable". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:18, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Ron Kulpa

I'm not sure if you're aware, but the edits you have been reverting concerning relevance are being discussed on Talk:Ron Kulpa - please read/comment there before reverting the edits again. Garchy (talk) 20:01, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, RefereeOrganist. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Baseball Umpires

Hi. I don't think we've met, but I am seeing your name pop up quite often at Baseball Umpire Biographies. I myself am very interested in referee articles from all sports. So much so I started a wikiproject. I have been going through all the Category:Sports officials articles and cleaning them up (big issues wwith WP:Undue}. I have already done cricket, rugby union, rugby league, soccer, american football, gaelic football, australian rules and a few other smaller sports. Currently I am working my way through baseball. I just wanted to pop a note on your talk page to let you know what I am doing as I am assuming you have most of these pages watchlisted. I apologise for the watchlist spam. I enjoy, and follow to a degree all sports, but not being American my baseball knowledge is a little limited, so would welcome any discussion regarding my edits here, at my talk page or a specific article. AIRcorn (talk) 09:20, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the intro. Good to see an effort toward organizing these articles. RefereeOrganist (talk) 02:59, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, RefereeOrganist. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, RefereeOrganist. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]