Talk:Scientologie, Wissenschaft von der Beschaffenheit und der Tauglichkeit des Wissens
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Scientologie, Wissenschaft von der Beschaffenheit und der Tauglichkeit des Wissens article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Free Zone
[edit]Wait what does this article have to do with the Free Zone?
- Nothing, I changed the cat.
- Well, if you'd done a five-second Google search, it's explained in the first link in a search for "free zone scientologie": [1] wikipediatrix 17:19, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, I should have said, "nothing that is mentioned in the article", which was certainly true as of yet yesterday. It still seems that the book, in fact, has very little to do with LRH's scientology or its Free Zone, but I now see that the book has been published by Free Zone e.V, apparently just because of its title. - Nat Krause(Talk!) 21:29, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- Well, if you'd done a five-second Google search, it's explained in the first link in a search for "free zone scientologie": [1] wikipediatrix 17:19, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Germanic
[edit]Also, I have no idea what "the Germanic way of expressing the word Scientology" means. You might think that means it's the German word for Scientology, but de:Scientology begs to differ. - Nat Krause(Talk!) 06:55, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- I didn't say it's the German word for Scientology. It means precisely what it says. For another example, the Germanic form of expressing "Biology" is "Biologie". Ditto, Scientology. The reason de:Scientology spells it with a final Y is because they're referring specifically to the religion, not scientologie as a general term. wikipediatrix 17:16, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- I still don't know what you mean. English is a Germanic language, so every English word is a Germanic way of expressing something. Germanic languages are several, though, so there is no the Germanic way of anything, unless it's the same in each of those languages. Please explain. - Nat Krause(Talk!) 21:29, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- I didn't mean the broadest sense of "Germanic", I meant specifically pertaining to Germany. I didn't want to say scientologie is "the German word for Scientology" because that sounded slightly misleading (because it predates Hubbard's religion) but perhaps it's the best way to do it after all. wikipediatrix 13:52, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
- I still don't know what you mean. English is a Germanic language, so every English word is a Germanic way of expressing something. Germanic languages are several, though, so there is no the Germanic way of anything, unless it's the same in each of those languages. Please explain. - Nat Krause(Talk!) 21:29, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- I didn't say it's the German word for Scientology. It means precisely what it says. For another example, the Germanic form of expressing "Biology" is "Biologie". Ditto, Scientology. The reason de:Scientology spells it with a final Y is because they're referring specifically to the religion, not scientologie as a general term. wikipediatrix 17:16, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Nordenholz and Aryan racial theory
[edit]I marked the note about Nordenholz being and advocate of Aryan racial theory with "citation needed".
The only source i see about it is on xenu.net, which is a very anti-scn site. --Amir E. Aharoni 20:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
First Use of the Word
[edit]The English-language term "Scientology" originated neither with Hubbard nor Nordenholz, but with philologist Allen Upward, who coined the term in 1907 in his book The New Word.[2]
This reference is cited to be a use of the word to ridicule pseudoscientific theories by Jon Atack, a COS critic.[1] This would not be a problem if the critic were actually accurate in his understanding of the text.
However, examination of the original text shows that in Upward's book The New Word the word 'scientology' is used to describe "science elevated to unquestioning doctrine", and does not have sense implied by Atack.
"...unhappily scientology is as often mistaken for science as theology is for worship."--The New Word, p. 149[3]
The reference to the original source text should be maintained, and the misinterpretation should be pulled out —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ema Zee (talk • contribs) 06:13, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
References
- ^ Atack, Jon. A Piece of Blue Sky, p. 127. Lyle Stuart, 1990. ISBN 081840499X
Removed this info as it violated WP:OR. Best to stick to secondary sources that satisfy WP:RS and WP:V. Cirt (talk) 18:54, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
"The term "Scientologie" is a registered trademark of the Religious Technology Center,"
[edit]I would doubt whether this is meaningfully true in Germany, so it should be clarified... AnonMoos (talk) 18:19, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
- As far as I understand it, according to traditional German law, a book title has pretty much the same legal force as a trademark, and someone other than the Miscavige Scientology organization bought the rights to the book... AnonMoos (talk) 21:49, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Scientologie, Wissenschaft von der Beschaffenheit und der Tauglichkeit des Wissens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080301002747/http://www.iheartchaos.com:80/2008/02/27/did-lron-hubbard-plagarize-scientology-the-more-you-know/ to http://www.iheartchaos.com/2008/02/27/did-lron-hubbard-plagarize-scientology-the-more-you-know/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Scientologie, Wissenschaft von der Beschaffenheit und der Tauglichkeit des Wissens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050819232335/http://www.scientologie.org/gif/wipo-decision.pdf to http://www.scientologie.org/gif/wipo-decision.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.iheartchaos.com/2008/02/27/did-lron-hubbard-plagarize-scientology-the-more-you-know/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:56, 20 May 2017 (UTC)