User talk:Ema Zee

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello Ema Zee, welcome to Wikipedia!

I noticed nobody had said hi yet... Hi!

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

You might like some of these links and tips:

some General guidance.
Tutorial and the Manual of Style.
Find out how to revert, move and merge pages.
Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
Add yourself to the New user log and a regional notice board
Ask questions at the Village pump or Help desk.
Use the Show preview button
Provide an Edit summary
Add the correct image copyright tag to any images you upload
Take a look at Consensus of standards
Create a User page

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing, -- Alf ^melmac 07:26, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese War Tuba

Wow, your article on Japanese War Tuba is really interesting, I haven't heard of any thing like it before. It would be good if you could cite some sources as most people (including me) aren't very familiar with them and could have a hard time taking the facts seriously as the subject is very foreign to us. You can add a reference using footnotes or simply by adding a new header called == References == --O bli (Talk)^? 23:20, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Japanese War Tuba, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--O bli (Talk)^? 17:43, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Angel Oak

I thought the text you added to the Angel Oak article looked familiar. It is lifted from a pdf I read when looking up the tree when I first created the article.--Paraphelion 04:07, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ethics (Scientology)

Hello. You must have noticed, I reverted your edits on the Ethics (Scientology) article. I meant to give you feedback sooner on why I did it, sorry for the delay. The problem is that pretty much every paragraph was unattributed (who said so) and not sourced (where the information came from), the result is that the whole thing read like an original research, and also somewhat as a advertisement a few places. Had it been a single paragraph, I would have tagged it as 'citation needed', but the changes were significant such that the whole article became problematic. You can recover you text using the diff feature of wikipedia and make changes such that the text is attributed, and provide citations to reliable source. Raymond Hill 04:29, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Codex copyright

Hi there. Two things concerning this edit: I'm afraid linking to copyright violations is not allowed, so I had to remove it (per the 'notice on linking' at the top of Wikipedia:External links). Also you marked the edit as minor when it was actually quite a large addition; please only mark edits as minor when they really are. Thanks! --Quiddity 18:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Joan Wood

I have nominated Joan Wood, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joan Wood. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Dloh cierekim 05:36, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Scientology, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 22:13, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted you change

Did you mean to delete all this?...I reverted you seeing it as a a questionable removal. If I am wrong, feel free to restore your edit.--MONGO 02:39, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Depth of focus (tectonics), as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Please also remember to cite your sources. In this case the content that you copied is off a public domain website (USGS) and should be stated so. Dawnseeker2000 00:46, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Middle English creole hypothesis, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English and French (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Electrophonic Hearing

Hello! I see that you have created the article above, but you haven't submitted it for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Did you intend to? —Anne Delong (talk) 05:04, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Symphony No. 5 (Beethoven) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:44, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Electrophonic Hearing concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Electrophonic Hearing, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:05, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Electrophonic Hearing concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Electrophonic Hearing, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Electrophonic Hearing

Hello Ema Zee. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Electrophonic Hearing".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Electrophonic Hearing}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 07:08, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Microwave auditory effect

An article that you have been involved in editing—Microwave auditory effect—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 14:44, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ema Zee. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ema Zee. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ema Zee. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]