Talk:School of Diplomacy

China: History Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chinese history (assessed as Mid-importance).

Philosophy: Social and political / Eastern / Ancient Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy
	Eastern philosophy
	Ancient philosophy

diplomacy?

If, as the article suggests, these "diplomats" (against which the author seems to be rather biased) did nothing else but advocating attacking each other, why then are they called "diplomats", a diplomat - first and formost, I would say - trying to solve conflicts by way of talks...? Or were these only talks to prepare war? --HilmarHansWerner (talk) 16:54, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]