Talk:Schlern

Mountains: Alps Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Alps task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Italy Mid‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

English name

It seems that the name "Sciliar" is more commonly used in English than "Schlern" (sciliar: 36,500 hits; schlern: 25,200 hits). It is better to leave the article where it is at this moment.--Suppar luca 09:29, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

and if you do a correct search (namely minus the names of the villages around the mountain, who all use the mountain in their name) you get:

Schlern 22,500 hits
Sciliar 18,500 hits

--noclador (talk) 16:38, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Google Books: 605 hits for Schlern vs 48 for Sciliar

Google Scholar: 119 hits for Schlern+mountain vs 37 hits for Sciliar+mountain

--Mai-Sachme (talk) 19:13, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Translation

Make a decision: do you want to translate the title "Zeitschrift für Südtiroler Landeskunde" in English? I don't care either way, but if you translate it, you have to do it according to the naming conventions, that is: "Places should generally be referred to consistently using the same name as in the title of their article". I'll put the correct translation if you don't mind.--Suppar luca 10:47, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Naming Convention does not apply in this case: read the link you provided - it talks about "Geographical items" and "Places". This is a proper name which does not need to be changed. Also the "Südtiroler" in the subtitle does not refer to the area, but to the culture - the South Tyrolean culture, meaning the culture of the German population of the area. So changing the magazines subtitle is a) not required b) is factually wrong. --noclador (talk) 11:05, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

+1 --Mai-Sachme (talk) 11:55, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's a title, a proper name. Hope you won't change Albert Einstein to Albert One Stone... Gun Powder Ma (talk) 18:44, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]