Talk:Schick (razors)

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Health and fitness Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Xtreme3.jpg

Image:Xtreme3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 08:41, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Schick

Why is there no reference to the original (electric) Schick razors? Schick made history and was market leader. And was strongly opposed to wet razors. (That's why he invented the dry electric one.) --Jhartmann (talk) 11:49, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Hydrates only during shaving"

This is a minor controversy, but so incredibly stupid it might be noteworthy.

Aside from some bewilderment on Twitter, a search for this disclaimer from their TV ads brings up this legal complaint (scroll way down) and this FTC decision.

Worth some sort of mention? InedibleHulk (talk) 03:40, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]