Talk:Scantrust
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. |
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Company description should be improved
[edit]Currently company intro reads as Scantrust "is a Swiss company that provides an Internet of things platform for identifying products on the internet." This description may have been referring to a specific feature that often appears alongside barcodes described as GTINs. GTINs "...are also used to identify products sold online."[1] It would be more accurate to say it's a "platform for placing identifiers on products to associate them with information on the internet." BirchManner (talk) 18:48, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
References
Article review
[edit]Following the first submission of the article, which was declined, I have made made a thorough review of the article and the sources used to establish notability. The discussion with editor User: DESiegel provides some context: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DESiegel#Follow-up_on_your_comments_re._Draft_on_Scantrust
June 2020 bad sources
[edit]I have removed several sources that were paid promotion, for example Supplychaindive, where you can get your press release posted for $179. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:46, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking the time and making the modifications ThatMontrealIP, I appreciate it very much. One comment regarding the Supply Chain Dive source, despite that they accept press releases, there is an editorial team and the source [1] was clearly not paid promotion. In my view, it is a secondary source which makes an analysis and commentary regarding the company. May I ask if you could reconsider this source? Thank you, Factfox (talk) 18:32, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Nope. The copy in the article also looks like it was derived from a press release. "By using ScanTrust's cloud-based software, companies can keep track of their parts and products and identify weak spots in their supply chains." Either way, it's a lousy publisher. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 18:38, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback from New Page Review process
[edit]I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good start..
North8000 (talk) 10:07, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Start-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/17 June 2020
- Accepted AfC submissions
- Start-Class company articles
- Unknown-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Start-Class Switzerland articles
- Unknown-importance Switzerland articles
- All WikiProject Switzerland pages
- Start-Class software articles
- Unknown-importance software articles
- Start-Class software articles of Unknown-importance
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Software articles
- Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions