Talk:Scaled Composites Model 367 BiPod

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Article needs a photo

The article really needs a photo or a drawing of the BiPod "convertible" aeroplane/automobile. I would imagine that a small thumbnail photo could be used in the article under the "Fair Use" clause in US copyright law. Cheers. N2e (talk) 13:47, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here are many images which might be used, some of which would fall under the Fair Use criteria. Google search

BIPOD

This article title currently uses the capitalisation "BiPod." the company website project page capitalises it as "BIPOD." Any objections to moving this article to the associated title? — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 03:32, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

None here. If that's what the mfgr. calls it, best we get it corrected. N2e (talk) 04:01, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure the MoS requires that "BIPOD" be rendered as "Bipod" (never mind that's inventing a name used only for Wikipedia, all glory to the ~~Hypnotoad~~MoS). - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 15:56, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it doesn't seem to be an acronym, so MOS:CAPS says that in that case we should write "Bipod". That's still a move, though not the one I originally assumed. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 16:45, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]