Talk:Satoshi Kamiya
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Showing why he is an "origami master"
[edit]I was the one who placed the speedy deletion article and it was in good faith. It seemed to me (uneducated in the world of origami") that this may have been a simple vanity page. From the admin taking off the post, I took it upon myself to search (google) and find out more about this person. In that sense, the article was "failing", at least for me. Personally, I would like to see more mention of the books published by and/or on Kamiyas such as this one. Also, have there been any interviews or articles specifically on Kamiya? I hope this gives other editors food-for-thought about adding to the article. I will be stepping away now as I feel this is in good hands. Cheers! -- MOE.RON talk | done | doing 01:59, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Well, my googling indicated notability. Though I accept that opinions can certainly differ. --Fang Aili talk 14:52, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Japanese name
[edit]Is it 神谷哲史? Unfortunately I can only read the characters, not pronounce them in Japanese :-) Kusma (討論) 03:07, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Born in 1981
[edit]Personal website states that he was born in 1981 (and not 1983 as this article earlier stated). Shinhan 13:18, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Don't delete, improve
[edit]From all research, I think this is a very notable person, and don't think this article should be removed, so much as redone. It really does not verify most of its claims, and I think calling him the most advanced origami expert is in bad taste. Research does indicate he is one of the reigning champions of origami, but using superlatives as in calling a person the most advanced person of any subject is generally only opinion and not appropriate for Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.173.111.26 (talk) 22:19, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Bias
[edit]The first few sentences read like a brochure... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.154.23.63 (talk) 01:13, 21 February 2010 (UTC)