Talk:Sarojini Nadar

A fact from Sarojini Nadar appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 July 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that South African theologian Sarojini Nadar examined the Book of Esther as a "text of terror" in normalizing rape culture?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sarojini Nadar.

Wikipedia

It is requested that an image or photograph of Sarojini Nadar be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Women in Religion Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa: South Africa

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	South Africa portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Africa.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Women in Red

This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bilorv (talk) 12:18, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that since 2016, Sarojini Nadar has been Director of the Desmond Tutu Centre for Religion and Justice, and Desmond Tutu Research Chair at University of the Western Cape in South Africa? Source: Public Lecture by Professor Sarojini Nadar: "Sanctifying Sex" [1]
- ALT1:... that Sarojini Nadar's research has focused on gender-based violence, sexual and reproductive health, and critical pedagogy in higher education? Source: Public Lecture by Professor Sarojini Nadar: "Sanctifying Sex" [2]
- ALT2:... that South African theologian Sarojini Nadar examined the Book of Esther as a "text of terror" in normalizing rape culture? "to encourage the participants to read this segment of the text as a "text of terror."" and "How is it that in spite of (or perhaps because) of their erasure, rape and sexual violence have been so ingrained and rationalized through their representations as to appear 'natural' and inevitable to women as to men?" Nadar Thesis, p. 279 & p. 283, respectively.

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Jim Clendenen

Created by Melcous (talk). Nominated by Figureskatingfan (talk) at 21:31, 6 June 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General eligibility:

New enough: - check comments section
Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting: - check comments

QPQ: Done.

Overall: the article has two edits only in the View history, first it was created and in the second edit, only a wiki link has been added. So, I'm not sure if it has been expanded 5x. The first hook is more interesting, the second hook is less interesting. This is my second review only, so I would appreciate it if someone else could look over it. Salukk (talk) 10:30, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New enough (written June 5) & all hooks approved. Relying on review of other criteria by Salukk. Salukk, articles written or moved to the mainspace within 7 days of the nomination qualify for DYK. QuakerSquirrel (talk) 12:53, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]