Talk:Sargun Mehta/Archive 1
|
|
Her hubby's (Ravi Dubey) surname
[edit]Recently i see that she has added her hubby's surname and writes her name as Sargun Mehta Dubey on April 2014, but newspapers are still writes her name as Sargun Mehta, see recently published articles, [1], [2], [3], [4], So please suggest me that this article should be move on a new name? Hetika (talk) 15:14, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- So Naming conventions - people offers the best advice here. Per that page, the general rule is to use the name by which that person is best known. Based on what you posted, it would seem that they are still most commonly called Sargun Mehta, at least right now. If/When reliable sources start to use Sargun Mehta Dubey to describe her on a regular basis, especially the better sources, I think it would then make sense to move the article. Sargun Mehta Dubey is already set as a redirect for the article, so that's a good thing. If/When the move happens, please remember NOT to do a copy-paste move as that screws up the history. There's a requested move process to help with moves. Ravensfire (talk) 16:45, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- On one hand, it should be moved that's how she wishes to be known, but as you said, if no one else is picking up on that yet, maybe it can wait a while, until other start calling her that professionally. There is no hard rule about that, but there is WP:common name, which would indicate that it's a bit too early to make the switch. BollyJeff | talk 16:52, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- @Ravensfire:,@Bollyjeff: Thank for a big help, I just asked cause' when i see Aishwarya Rai's article that has moved Aishwarya Rai Bachchan after her marriage, And same with Kareena Kapoor article {moved Kareena Kapoor Khan after her marriage); So i just asked it.. so Thanks again! Hetika (talk) 14:59, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Sargun Mehta/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Yashthepunisher (talk · contribs) 14:42, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
I'll review it in few days. Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:42, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Lead
[edit]- "Mehta was born in Chandigarh. She has a degree in Bachelor of Commerce from the University of Delhi." — This line looks unnecessary, please remove it. The lead should be concise. Yashthepunisher (talk) 4:42, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- done. Hetika (talk) 16:28, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Early life and education
[edit]- Remove the date of birth from this section, as it is already mentioned in her infobox. --Yashthepunisher (talk) 4:45, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Actually, Birth is sourced from here. Hetika (talk) 16:28, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- "the daughter of Mrs. Aradhana Mehta" -Is it really Important? --Yashthepunisher (talk) 4:48, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- removed. Hetika (talk) 16:28, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
As a child, Mehta auditioned for the dance reality show Boogie Woogie, participating as a contestant along with her brother. She danced to "Barbie Girl", a song from the album Aquarium, and her brother performed to "O O Jaane Jaana" from the film Pyaar Kiya To Darna Kya; they were both rejected.— Rephrase it to As a child, Mehta along with her brother participated in the dance reality show Boogie Woogie; they both eventually were rejected. --Yashthepunisher (talk) 4:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)"Mehta was educated at the Sacred Heart Convent school in Chandigarh until tenth grade, and she completed eleventh and twelfth grades at the Carmel Convent School. After finishing her education, she moved to Delhi and enrolled in Kirori Mal College, Delhi University, India, for a degree in commerce." — Rephrase it to Mehta was educated at the Carmel Convent School and graduated in commerce from the Kirori Mal College, Delhi University. --Yashthepunisher (talk) 5:13, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Content is sourced, so no need to make it short. Hetika (talk) 16:28, 3 June 2015 (UTC)No, GA mentions such redundant details. It makes the article unnecessarily long, and effects its flow. --Yashthepunisher (talk) 4:46, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- "After it ended, she moved to Mumbai, and she lives in Malad West, Mumbai Suburban district, Maharashtra. — Rephrase it to After the serial ended, she shifted to Mumbai. --Yashthepunisher (talk) 5:25, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- done. Hetika (talk) 16:28, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
"Mehta's fame increased when she played in the 2011 television series Phulwa and the 2012 Kya Huaa Tera Vaada.[8][12] She established herself as a leading actress, when she appeared the Colors TV drama series Balika Vadhu. — This line has no place here. This section should only focus on her background. Paste it in her career section. --Yashthepunisher (talk) 5:35, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Some GA/FA articles writes it like this. Hetika (talk) 16:28, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid reason. Split this section into two, the other section should be about her personal life. --Yashthepunisher (talk) 5:57, 2 June 2015
personal life is not enough for a separate section. Hetika (talk) 16:28, 3 June 2015 (UTC)What makes you think that personal life is not enough for a separate section. This section is about her early life and education, and there is enough substance for a seperate section. Please try and split it, because it looks absurd --Yashthepunisher (talk) 4:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Awards and nominations
[edit]- Ref no. 72 is dead, archive it. Yashthepunisher (talk) 5:02, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- No any archive or other reliable sources found on net. please suggest me something for this content. Hetika (talk) 16:28, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hi @Hetika: I got here by your message on my talk page. Anyways I am not sure about the reliability of Tellychakkar, but since you have already used that in your article, you can replace that dead link (ref. 72) with this source. It does indicate her nomination for the award. Hope it helps! :) -- FrankBoy CHITCHAT 17:44, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- No any archive or other reliable sources found on net. please suggest me something for this content. Hetika (talk) 16:28, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Recent removal content
[edit]@Yashthepunisher: Dharmadhyaksha just told you to remove the attendees of Mehta like this, "Mehta attended the launch party of the UTV Stars TV show Walk Of The Stars at Olive in Mumbai" and to fix some copyedit/grammar, Not say to remove her performances. And about references, "tellychakkar.com" is RELIABLE as recently tellychakkar team entered in Bigg Boss house to ask questions. The site is using by major news websites like, International Business Times [5]. - "bollywoodlife.com" site is created by leading news channel Zee News with Zee Entertainment Enterprises, so can't say that it's not reliable. - Per Wikipedia:Video links, "Youtube.com" is reliable source if the video link is comes from a official account. The content of section "In the media" is not unnecessary, see first Shahid Kapoor article. - Pinging User:Vensatry, User:Kailash29792, User:FrB.TG, User:Relentlessly for consensus. Akshaytherock (talk) 16:14, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Content was excessively detailed. This is a GA, not a fan site or a tabloid. WP:FART applies: not every detail is significant; many are not. Drmies (talk) 17:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Drmies: Only significant detail? Okay, you just wait.. I'll show something here in few minutes. Akshaytherock (talk) 16:05, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- I've removed excessive and unsignificant details from Shahid Kapoor, a GA article. Applied the same rule as what you done. Akshaytherock (talk) 16:09, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- What are you trying to prove, Akshaytherock? You're turning WP:POINT into total dickishness. Yeah, you totally showed me. SpacemanSpiff, what do you make of this? I know you're a big fan of Ms. Mehta. Or, do you know where this highly combative user comes from, all of a sudden? Drmies (talk) 17:38, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- I've removed excessive and unsignificant details from Shahid Kapoor, a GA article. Applied the same rule as what you done. Akshaytherock (talk) 16:09, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Drmies: Only significant detail? Okay, you just wait.. I'll show something here in few minutes. Akshaytherock (talk) 16:05, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- Please keep all related discussions on GAR page. This one is a community GAR where all can participate. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 02:25, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Dharmadhyaksha: On GAR, really??? The last time I asked something on there, but on one replied. Akshaytherock (talk) 16:02, 21 October 2015 (UTC)