Talk:Sardinian Action Party
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Regional elections in Veneto 1990
[edit]Why has the party obtained one seat in Veneto at the regional elections of 1990? See [1]--93.104.61.53 (talk) 21:37, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Sardinian Action Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716170622/http://www.partitosardo.it/index.aspx?m=53&did=54 to http://www.partitosardo.it/index.aspx?m=53&did=54
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100401072627/http://provinciali.interno.it/provinciali/P000.htm to http://provinciali.interno.it/provinciali/P000.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:35, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Electoral results
[edit]@User:Facquis, @User:Nick.mon: I am not totally happy of your latest edits on the "electoral results" section. Some interesting notes were removed, but, more importantly, the regional shares of the vote are no longer shown. I think it is much mure interesting to show, for instance, that the party regionally won 14.9% in 1946 and 12.0% in 1987 than 0.34% and 0.44%, respectively. Could you add another column? Same with Liga Veneta Repubblica! --Checco (talk) 12:48, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Checco: Well, I didn't remove anything and, sorry, but I didn't notice it. I only removed the allied parties in the section of percentages. Anyway, we can re-add the regional shares of vote. -- Nick.mon (talk) 12:59, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Checco: Regional shares of the vote are shown in regional elections, anyway I think that could be added a column with regional results in general elections, but the global percentage is much more important in general election, for example in 1987 this party gets some votes also from other regions. Same with Liga Veneta Repubblica.--Facquis (talk) 13:12, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- @User:Nick.mon: Sorry, about that.
- @User:Facquis: I hold the opposite view: in general or European Parliament elections, for regional parties, the regional share of the vote counts more than the global one. However, we can agree on the solution. Would you be so kind to introduce a separate column and restore the regional shares both here and at Liga Veneta Repubblica? Thanks in advance. --Checco (talk) 14:08, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Checco: Regional shares of the vote are shown in regional elections, anyway I think that could be added a column with regional results in general elections, but the global percentage is much more important in general election, for example in 1987 this party gets some votes also from other regions. Same with Liga Veneta Repubblica.--Facquis (talk) 13:12, 25 February 2019 (UTC)