Talk:Sarasota School of Architecture
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sarasota School of Architecture article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Legacy section
[edit]The reliance on primary sources (see also WP:SELFPUB and WP:BLPSELFPUB) to cite the last two paragraphs of the "Legacy" section should be discussed. Generally, Wikipedia tries to avoid using primary sources to support statements or claims someone/something is saying about themselves/itself since it can be seen as a form of WP:PROMO. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:44, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- I agree that the sources cited for the last two paragraphs of the Legacy section are strongly promotional. If there is no independent reliable source discussing the legacy of the Sarasota School, then those paragraphs should be removed. - Donald Albury 13:26, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- The first of those two paragraphs points out that two organizations exist whose purpose is to preserve Sarasota School of Architecture structures. I am not sure how that can be promotional, if the gist of the paragraph merely acknowledges their existence. Not sure where the 'promotional' aspect lies here. I replaced and added additional footnotes. The second paragraph, I have also replaced footnotes with ones that, hopefully, are less problematic.Architecttype (talk) 02:29, 10 January 2019 (UTC)