Talk:Santi Romano

Santi Romano is currently a Law good article nominee. Nominated by Gitz (talk) (contribs) at 09:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.

Short description: Italian lawyer and judge (1875–1947)

Italy

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Santi Romano/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Gitz6666 (talk · contribs) 09:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Pbritti (talk · contribs) 04:31, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm Pbritti and I'm glad to be reviewing this article. Looking forward to a bit of a change of pace for this review, as I usually stick to other subject areas. Please expect comments today UTC! ~ Pbritti (talk) 04:31, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you, Pbritti. I'll do my best to reply ASAP. Gitz (talk) (contribs) 05:33, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid life has happened. Gitz6666, can you wait until the end of this upcoming week for a continuation on this review? ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:12, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's absolutely not a problem, I'm also quite busy at the moment! Thanks for letting me know. Gitz (talk) (contribs) 17:20, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, thank you so much. Looking forward to giving your work the treatment it deserves. ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:22, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Early comments

Was busier than anticipated—a charcuterie board was involved—but I've now read the article and some minimal outside searching. A couple initial comments are below.

Consider elaborating on the ecclesiastical law element. As of right now, it's by inference that we're referring to Catholic canon law.
This strikes me as a source that ought to get integrated. I would note how it even identifies the dates of translations.

Thank you. Excellent source, worth integrating. I'll do it as soon as possible (I'm also quite busy in RL and on the wiki). The dates of translation of his major works match: Romano, S. [1918] 2017. The Legal Order.

Your first point is tricky. I know from personal knowledge aka WP:OR that "ecclesiastical law" was not synonymous with "canon law" as our redirect might imply. By "ecclesiastical law", legal scholars like Romano did not mean the internal law of the Catholic Church ("canon law"), but the law governing the relationship between the State and the Catholic Church. Most of that law was usually described as domestic (state) public law. So it would be worth creating a separate article "Ecclesiastical law" to clarify the point. Now I have the sources, but not the time. And I don't have a source for Romano stating that he didn't use "ecclesiastical law" as a synonym for canon law, so I'd prefer to leave the matter untouched in this article and create an "Ecclesiastical law" article in the future, or at least a section on "Ecclesiastical law" in our "Canon law" article. Gitz (talk) (contribs) 23:07, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done (re new source, De Wilde) Gitz (talk) (contribs) 00:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source spot check

1e. Website is the official biographical website of the Italian senate in Italian, so reliability is safely assumed. All of these positions seem verified, but I think we only need a single citation for all this. I recommend a brief sentence introducing this section and its list.

Done

- 1f. Ibid.
- 1m. Ibid.
- 1p. Ibid.
- 1t. Ibid.
3b.
4b.
5c.
6a.
6f.
6g.
9a.
11b.
14.
17.
19.
20.
22.
23. AGF
25.