This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article seems to be more about punishment under Sharia law, or against the death penalty by such laws, than the subject. It has one reference, Human Rights Watch, and does not even mention the actual subject of the horrible crime, to which the subject reportedly entered a guilty plea, of killing a woman and her two children. He represented himself, that was apparently allowed, yet the article makes it appear there was an injustice with "...he did not have legal representation at his trial (opting for self-defense).". We should cover the victim, when it is notable, and not the perpetrator, and certainly not use Wikipedia as a vehicle to advance a biased opinion. I removed the "See also" section as it had absolutely nothing to do with the "Price of tea in China". Otr500 (talk) 10:10, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
