Talk:Sandra Hill (footballer)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Cambodia Low‑importance

Sandra Hill (footballer) is part of WikiProject Cambodia, a project to improve all Cambodia-related articles. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group on Wikipedia, aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Cambodia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.CambodiaWikipedia:WikiProject CambodiaTemplate:WikiProject CambodiaCambodia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cambodia To-do:

Let us work in the best reference and presentation of archaeological sites of Cambodia beyond Angkor like Sambor Prei Kuk, Angkor Borei (Takeo), etc.

Should disambiguate Republican Party for Democracy and Renewal and generally try to link up social conscience with right-wing values.

I'm looking for the best picture or any informations about the KAF's U-6 (Beaver). It seem that the KAF had 3 aircrafts. But in 1971, during the viet cong's sapper attack at the Pochentong Air Base,at least 1 Beaver was destroyed.In 1972 at leat 1 Beaver was refurbished with a new engine. http://www.khmerairforce.com/AAK-KAF/AVNK-AAK-KAF/Cambodia-Beaver-KAF.JPG

Thankfull for this info. [Unsigned]

Women's sport: WOSO Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Women's association football portal This article is supported by the Women's football / soccer task force.

Football: American & Canadian / Women's football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American and Canadian soccer task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Women's association football portal This article is supported by the women's football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Requested move 1 September 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved, disambiguation page created at Sandra Hill in the meantime. No such user (talk) 07:52, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sandra Hill (footballer) → Sandra Hill – Sole Wikipedia main title header that bears this exact name, thus obviating the need for the parenthetical qualifier "(footballer)". Although Wikipedia does contain entries for two women surnamed "Hill" whose given name at birth was "Sandra" — Sandy Hill (television personality) and Sandy Hill (mountaineer) — both women are or have been celebrities whose stage name / pen name is "Sandy Hill" and neither one would be recognizable to the public as "Sandra Hill". A hatnote atop the footballer's entry — For those with a similar name, see Sandy Hill (disambiguation) — would attend to any possible uncertainties. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 10:28, 1 September 2021 (UTC)— Relisting. Havelock Jones (talk) 11:29, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose both Sandy Hill (mountaineer) and Sandy Hill (television personality) are "Sandra Hill" and the views are 4,449 and 817 v only 32[[1]] for this one. Even if the others are only occasionally called "Sandra Hill" its still unlikely the footballer would be primary. In other words even if the other 2 were only called "Sandra Hill" 1% of the time they would still be more likely than the footballer. Google also doesn't appear to show anything for the footballer. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:24, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. It should be made clear that the nomination neither makes a claim that Sandra Hill (footballer) is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of the Sandy Hill disambiguation page nor that Sandra Hill (footballer) is primary at all. If another woman named "Sandra Hill" achieves notability sufficient for creation of a Wikipedia article, this Sandra Hill should certainly have the parenthetical qualifier "(footballer)" restored.

However, it would be counterintuitive to compare the footballer Sandra Hill to two celebrities named "Sandy Hill" since those two women have never been referenced as "Sandra Hill", are not known to the public as "Sandra Hill" and no one would search for either of them under the name "Sandra Hill". As for the footballer, the only way to know that her entry exists is to be redirected to the Sandy Hill dab page and peruse the listings there, most of which are for places, not people, although there is no indication that Sandra the footballer is known as "Sandy". —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 01:55, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom, which provides enough disambiguation between this page and others who are primarily known as Sandy Hill. Seany91 (talk) 07:23, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Primarily known is not the same thing as primarily associated with. As noted even if the others were known as "Sandy" instead of "Sandra" 99% of the time the term with Sandra would not be primarily associated with the footballer. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:45, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. To put this nomination into perspective, the Sandy Hill disambiguation page has 11 entries. Eight of those entries, under section header "Places", list actual sandy hills, i.e. geographical features named "Sandy Hill", none of which is also known as "Sandra Hill".

As for the remaining three entries, which are under header "Other uses", not "People", two entries list celebrity women whose professional name is "Sandy Hill" and who have never been known to the public as "Sandra Hill". That leaves a single, out-of-place entry for "Sandra Hill (footballer)", who is not referenced as "Sandy", and would be more usefully handled via a hatnote.

No one would look for Sandra Hill at Sandy Hill, thus making the Sandra Hill redirect to the "Sandy Hill" disambiguation page seem counterintuitive —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 13:18, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Giant Snowman 16:58, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - absolutely not the PRIMARYTOIPIC. Instead Sandra Hill should be turned into a standalone dab page. Giant Snowman 17:00, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support The logic behind the proposal appears to me to be impeccable. I think some opponents may not have fully understood the issues here. PatGallacher (talk) 22:58, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Crouch, Swale, who says it all. Narky Blert (talk) 13:15, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Close as moot. I just realised that Sandra Hill was created as a disambiguation page on 11 September 2021 by User:Joeykai, who appears not to have been involved in this disussion. That structurally changes the nature of the perceived problem, as only User:Narky Blert's comment was created after the new disambiguation page. From what I can infer, it looks much the same as what was argued for in the original nomination by User:Roman Spinner. Narky Blert did a round-robin page swap with Sandra Hill (disambiguation) on 12 September, about 36 hours later, and 23 minutes before posting here. Neither username appears in the history of WP:RM/TR around that date, nor can I find anything around the start of September at WP:RFD. So it is very difficult for me to trace the history from the start of this discussion, but I infer a disambiguation page substantially similar to the current one must have existed before 11/12 September. 85.67.32.244 (talk) 13:53, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.