Talk:San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2019

San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2019 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2019 is part of the San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 28, 2021	Good article nominee	Listed
May 4, 2021	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

European Microstates: San Marino Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European MicrostatesWikipedia:WikiProject European MicrostatesTemplate:WikiProject European MicrostatesEuropean Microstates articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject San Marino (assessed as Low-importance).

Eurovision Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eurovision, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Eurovision-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EurovisionWikipedia:WikiProject EurovisionTemplate:WikiProject EurovisionEurovision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2019/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 21:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Basic stuff and comments

Infobox looks good.
"take place select" → "take place to select"
Remove the comma after "San Marino in 2016".
Add serial commas after "1965", "for 2016", and "Italy, Spain".
"selected represent" → "selected to represent"
"on: vocal" → "on vocal"
Is there a word missing between "by nation"?
Archive all archivable sources (either manually or with this tool).

Done @Some Dude From North Carolina: I've addressed the above comments with the exception of the Oxford comma additions. I've been told in past reviews that British English does not use them. Grk1011 (talk) 14:01, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·