Talk:San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2008/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- The odd redundant word etc. I performed a copyedit, and it should be fine now. My only concern is that the WP:LEAD is very short. Even if the article is sparse, do not hesitate to make a decent lead. In particular, there is nothing on the selection and after the contest-sections. The lead should be at least twice, perhaps three times, the length.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Ref 32 is published on day 0? Is date lacking, or is it a typo?
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: On hold; longer lead = good article. Arsenikk (talk) 09:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: On hold; longer lead = good article. Arsenikk (talk) 09:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Sims and I addressed the concerns. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 19:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Looks great. Congratulations with a good article. Arsenikk (talk) 22:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)