This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
@Theroadislong: Hi. Thanks for your contribution to this article. I just have a question around the deletion of some sections based on the fact that they rely on primary sources - Particularly the 'marriage' section. I have read the No Original Research page here and my interpretation, and my previous understanding is that primary sources are allowed, as long as the article doesn't rely too heavily on them and as long as they haven't been interpreted by the editor (Original Research). So a marriage certificate, for example is an official government document, not something close to the sources, and the editor has simply presented the facts it contains to enrich the biography. The guidelines state - "All analyses and interpretive or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary or tertiary source, and must not be an original analysis of the primary-source material by Wikipedia editors." - Which seems fairly clear, so would it be acceptable to restore parts of the deleted text which simply state facts recorded in primary sources? Many thanks Jason.nlw (talk) 06:43, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
