Talk:Sampooranathevan

India Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Hinduism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sampooranathevan-->Ayya Vaikundar

Not this article the same to article Ayya Vaikundar. Soon it will be expanted so that it will reveal. Vaikunda Raja

Origin of Sampooranathevan

Raja, seems to me that the article needs a better introduction, one that leads the reader naturally into the mythical life of Sampooranathevan. I suggest some sort of "birth" or "creation" account to explain Sampooranathevan's orgins. Is that possible? Steven McCrary 14:04, September 10, 2005 (UTC)

Steve, your's is a good suggestion. But in Akilam nothing more about Sampooranathevan was found. But simply mentioned him as a deva of that particular loga. Not only in this, in many cases, in Akilattirattu Ammanai simply the character is introduced with only a simple introduction. If any one needs history about such character he needs to refer Hindu mythology.

For example in case of Punal Rishi, Akilam says that he took the venneesan and brought him up. No other details of Punal Rishi was provided. And when we see about him in Hindu mythology (Siva Siddantha) he had a strong background. But this particular Venneesan does not come in hindu mythology. Likewise the Roma Rishi , Agastiya (In Ayyavazhi Agatheesar), Kalaikkottu Muni, Idaikkadar etc... Ayyavazhi has it's relationship with Hinduism as that of Judaism and Christianity. Many events and concepts of Hinduism were rejected, some were regenerated, some were accepted and some were totally condemned. But many characters in Hinduism came in Ayyavazhi. And in the case of Sampooranathevan I think, (not sure) there are chances for the available of this character in Hindu mythology. Because when ever the introduction and background of a character in Akilattirattu is too small it is to be searched in Hindu texts. That is the basic principle followed by some followers of Ayyavazhi. - வைகுண்ட & ராஜா

Member of the Seven Logas

This sentence does not "parse" well, I suggest major revision or deletion, especially since the links go no where. Steven McCrary 14:06, September 10, 2005 (UTC)

too many links

These are good articles, fascinating reading. But too many links are included. Links first of all have to connect to something: you will discourage your readers if you provide links which are only dead-ends. Then too don't link to general concepts like soul or God etc.: the general definitions provided there already are known by your readers and do not help the understanding of the article. I'd suggest linking only to names and concepts which are likely to be unfamiliar, always being sure that there is something at the other end to which to link.

--Kessler 20:45, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sampooranathevan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051018083338/http://kanyakumarionline.com/ayya/life_ayya_vaikundar.asp to http://www.kanyakumarionline.com/ayya/life_ayya_vaikundar.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:18, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]