Talk:Same-sex marriage in Michoacán
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jara
[edit]Looks like things are moving: [1] — kwami (talk) 00:32, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Man Mexico can be complex. My reading of this is that it clarifies that 1) registrars will not be prosecuted if they allow people who have obtained an amparo to marry, 2) they are looking for clarification if that will satisfy the judge (and they think it will) if the code is not changed to allow more legislative time, 3) State Commission of Human Rights' position is that legislation must be changed. Thanks for the piece @Kwamikagami: my schedule is crazy today, but if I can get back to it, I will see if I can find anything else to shed some light. SusunW (talk) 20:16, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Kwamikagami: I found two additional pieces. Both seem to indicate that the only way one can marry in Michoacán is via injunction. One says Congress has agreed to act, the other says Congress has not acted. One says the judge will probably waive the fines if they allow people who have amparo's to marry, the other says if legislation does not change they will face fines, removal of the head of the senate and possibility of removal of the governor. Opposite sides of a coin. Only thing we know for sure is the present situation is that an amparo is required. Will keep watching. SusunW (talk) 13:24, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
- Man Mexico can be complex. My reading of this is that it clarifies that 1) registrars will not be prosecuted if they allow people who have obtained an amparo to marry, 2) they are looking for clarification if that will satisfy the judge (and they think it will) if the code is not changed to allow more legislative time, 3) State Commission of Human Rights' position is that legislation must be changed. Thanks for the piece @Kwamikagami: my schedule is crazy today, but if I can get back to it, I will see if I can find anything else to shed some light. SusunW (talk) 20:16, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Same-sex marriage in Michoacán. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20141221115949/http://lajornadamichoacan.com.mx/2014/08/16/obtiene-registro-de-dos-ninos-el-segundo-matrimonio-gay-del-estado/ to http://www.lajornadamichoacan.com.mx/2014/08/16/obtiene-registro-de-dos-ninos-el-segundo-matrimonio-gay-del-estado/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:52, 26 February 2016 (UTC)