Talk:Saint Kitts and Nevis at the 2000 Summer Olympics

Saint Kitts and Nevis at the 2000 Summer Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Saint Kitts and Nevis at the 2000 Summer Olympics is part of the Saint Kitts and Nevis at the Olympics series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 24, 2017	Good article nominee	Listed
April 9, 2018	Good topic candidate	Promoted
March 29, 2022	Good topic removal candidate	Demoted
August 8, 2023	Good topic candidate	Promoted
Current status: Good article

Olympics Mid‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Caribbean: Saint Kitts & Nevis Low‑importance

	Caribbean portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Saint Kitts and Nevis (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Saint Kitts and Nevis at the 2000 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 19:16, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Will be reviewing this article as part of a GAN sweep. Comments will appear soon. MWright96 (talk) 19:16, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Lead

Wikilink Kim Collins and Velma Bass in the lead
- Done Kees08 (Talk)

Background

"Saint Kitts and Nevis made its Olympic debut in 1996 sending ten athletes." - better: Saint Kitts and Nevis made their first appearance at the Olympics in 1996, sending ten athletes
- Done Kees08 (Talk)
" Velma Bass previously competed at the 1996 Summer Olympics in the women's 4 × 100 meters relay." - change to partook for variety
- Done Kees08 (Talk)

Athletics

"This was the second Olympic appearance for both Collins and Bass, both" - comma inbetween the words "Bass" and "both" needs to be replaced with a semi colon
- Done Kees08 (Talk)
"Collins competed in both the 100 meter and 200 meter." - Collins competed in both the 100 meter and 200 meter dashes
- Done Kees08 (Talk)
"Collins finished fifth in the semifinals for the 200 meter event, failing to advance to the finals." - Collins placed fifth in the semifinals for the 200 meter event, and thus failed to advance to the finals.
- Done Kees08 (Talk)
"and eighth in the semi finals for the 200 meter." - 200 meter sprint
- done Kees08 (Talk)

Good work on this so far. You're on the right track for on getting this series of articles into a Good Topic. On hold. MWright96 (talk) 20:20, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@MWright96: Addressed everything you noted (and fixed a couple other things I noticed). Let me know if you find anything else and I will fix it. I will hit the other articles soon. Kees08 (Talk) 03:12, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Kees08: Thank you for addressing the issues I raised. Spotted nothing else that needs doing so this article can now be promoted to GA. MWright96 (talk) 05:50, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]