Jump to content

Talk:Saint-Louis-du-Louvre/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 19:48, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


I'll take another look at it tomorrow! Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:48, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

To get back to the issues raised in the first review:

  • Google books: this template should help. But I didn't really mean that, I meant the pages around here, where I often need to follow another link to get to what you point to (such as with Paul-Henri Marron in ref #10).
  • I still have a small problem with ref #11: The source says that the building was demolished in 1811 but that parts remained until 1850, being replaced with the Denon Wing. By clicking through some pages, I found that that is actually is a part of the Louvre Palace. Maybe you can clarify that in the prose, so that it matches better to the source?
  • You wikilinked Louvre Palace in the lead, but you should link it at the first mention in the content body as well.
  • The first paragraph of Saint-Louis-du-Louvre should not be without an inline citation.

Again, seven days to take care of the issues. Zwerg Nase (talk) 11:53, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've made appropriate edits. Thanks for the tip on the Google Books template. I haven't found a way to deal with the issue of the l'Oratoire du Louve pages. I still want to use that reference because it provides some unique information. I have added one non-web reference taken from the French Wikipedia page for Marron that is the source of some of that sentence.Djkeddie (talk) 23:50, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's a pass now, congratulations :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:22, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I will however list it under Art and architecture, not World History. Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:27, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks, having another person look at an article is invaluable.Djkeddie (talk) 22:25, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Saint-Louis-du-Louvre/GA2&oldid=675976349"