The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except in limited circumstances)
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article was nominated for deletion on 6 May 2010. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Yoga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Yoga, Hatha yoga, Yoga as exercise and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YogaWikipedia:WikiProject YogaTemplate:WikiProject YogaYoga articles
...The response from the increasingly powerful right-wing sections of the media demonstrates the interpenetration of interests of Hindutva and neoliberalism. Seeking proximity to whichever party was in power, Vedanta had become a public backer of the BJP’s political agenda (The Wire 2018). Hindutva-afliated news outlets branded protestors part of an “anti-national” conspiracy funded by “Jihadis,” and even the Church of England (Subramani 2018; Venkatesan 2018), thus evoking prevailing prejudices against non-Hindus portrayed in Hindutva discourse as opposed, by default, to the “national interests” (narrowly interpreted as wealth creation). The corporation also received support from infuential babas like Jaggi Vasudev and Baba Ramdev, both of whom have sprawling business enterprises and considerable followings among the core supporters of Hindutva (Bhatia and Lasseter 2017). In a particularly insensitive choice of vocabulary, given the context, Vasudev declared: “Lynching large businesses is economic suicide” (quoted in The Indian Express 2018). These examples show how the doxa constituted by the interpenetration of neoliberalism and Hindutva results in the protection not just of economic but also of the sociocultural interests of the corporate elite in India. Adhering to the tenets of Hindutva is now considered essential for Indian neoliberalism...
In Political Views section. The last line says "he accused liberals of being fanatics." Which from the source seems misleading.
From the source he said "Today, in the world, people who claim to be liberals are actually fanatics."
This indicates a difference that speaker is implying between people who claim to be liberal and actual liberals.
Further he says that the people he's talking about have characteristics which are not liberal.
I would suggest a change the concerned sentence to
'He remarked that those who claim to be liberals, in fact, exhibit fanaticism, distinguishing them from true liberals.' Sciencefanforhumanity (talk) 08:06, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Those who claim to be liberals are actually liberals unless I'm missing something, so Sadhguru is clearly calling real liberals fanatics. Now he might not believe that they really are liberals, but objectively they are. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:52, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In indian context it is not obvious that people who call themselves liberal are really so. Here is a para from a popular news article. There is a reason why liberals are derogatorily referred to as pseudo-secular, pseudo-intellectual and pseudo-liberal. For their agenda is not to be liberal.
I see. My concern is how do you correctly represent what the speaker has said in the original source? As clearly the speaker said people who claim to be and not just liberals. There is a difference between self-proclaimed liberals and liberals in general. Do you agree? Sciencefanforhumanity (talk) 20:20, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They seem to have said that *all* people who claim to be liberal are not liberals... And not just in the Indian context, but in the context of the whole world. Functionally no I do not think that there is a difference between those two, that seems to be getting into No True Scotsman territory. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 20:27, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to be classic rhetorical inversion, in general Sadhguru appears to have fallen into No True Scotsman territory. Those who proclaim to be liberals are in general actually liberals, the suggestion otherwise is fringe. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 21:00, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
About No True Scotsman,
I'm not trying to define who is a "true" liberal. I'm trying to accurately represent what Sadhguru said, which specifically referred to "claim to be". By equating "people who claim to be liberals" with "liberals" in general, we lose the skepticism implied in Sadhguru's original statement. This skepticism is an important part of understanding his perspective. Sciencefanforhumanity (talk) 21:29, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Its not skepticism, its a classic conservative talking point. The trope that "liberals aren't really liberal because they don't tolerate intolerance" did not begin in this conversation. The inversion that they aren't really centrists, they're fantics (remember Sadhguru is a genuine conservative religious fanatic). Horse Eye's Back (talk) 22:43, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If we cant agree on the meaning, probably should remove it or better cite it. If only one source, then just kill it, we cant put it in wikivoice if we dont understand it and cant agree on what it means. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 03:15, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]