Talk:Sabana Grande, Puerto Rico/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Sabana Grande, Puerto Rico. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
private schools
There are more private schools in Sabana Grande like Santa Ana Bilingual School,Christian Academy,and Academia Bautista.(206.248.94.212 (talk) 23:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC))
Saludos, estaba leyendo el articulo de Sabana Grande y me parece que las colindancias con los pueblos están incorrectas. Y Maginas en con g no con j. Muchas gracias!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.50.20.31 (talk) 01:37, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Merging the barrio articles into this article
@Level C: Sabana Grande's barrios (Machuchal, Rayo, Rincón, Sabana Grande barrio-pueblo, Santana, Susúa, Tabonuco, and Torre) all have stub articles (all created this past month, January 2019), and I believe they don't meet Wikipedia's notability criterion the way they are currently. Given that each of the barrios only has a population of a few thousand, I think unless they can be further elaborated to establish notability, they should all be merge into this article. For the meantime, I intend on soon tagging all the articles with a merge banner and waiting at least a few weeks before taking further action. Bfoshizzle1 (talk) 02:18, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- These meet notability. See WP:GEOLAND "Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low. Even abandoned places can be notable, because notability encompasses their entire history."--the eloquent peasant (talk) 02:36, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Onel5969: your opinion would be appreciated on this point. I just don't want redirects made if they would then have to be reverted, creating extra work. Thanks.--the eloquent peasant (talk) 03:14, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Clearly they meet notability as per WP:GEOLAND. Don't waste your time adding merge banners, which will simply be a waste of editors' time.Onel5969 TT me 03:50, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Onel5969: your opinion would be appreciated on this point. I just don't want redirects made if they would then have to be reverted, creating extra work. Thanks.--the eloquent peasant (talk) 03:14, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- These meet notability. See WP:GEOLAND "Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low. Even abandoned places can be notable, because notability encompasses their entire history."--the eloquent peasant (talk) 02:36, 1 February 2019 (UTC)