Talk:STS

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[C0 and C1 control codes#C1%20set|C1 set]] The anchor (#C1%20set) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was no move. Part Deux 19:08, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

STS → STS (disambiguation) — The Space Shuttle (Space Transportation System) is far more notable than the other entries on the disambiguation page, and would appear to be the most common usage of the term "STS". I am therefore suggesting that STS is moved to STS (disambiguation) and STS is redirected to either Space Shuttle or Space Shuttle program. GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 21:32, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''' on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

Oppose. One could argue that the car should get the redirect. Given the number of uses, leaving it alone is probably best. Vegaswikian 09:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - notability is nowhere near the same as "biggest" or "most expensive", especially not to a global audience. --Scott Davis ^Talk 08:37, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Add any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

So could this use some organization?User:Serprex 12:38, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Space Transportation System

Should this redirect page go to the Space Shuttle article or to the Space Shuttle program article? Vsst 22:57, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most definitely not; the Shuttle and Space Transportation System are two distinct entities. Calling a single component a "system" doesn't make logical sense, but that's what NASA did simply because the Shuttle was the only surviving part of a visionary system which quickly evaporated due to political reality (lack of funding). See Talk:Space Transportation System. JustinTime55 (talk) 21:10, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]