Talk:SMS Pommerania/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 16:34, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 16:34, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- She also received four 3.7 cm (1.5 in) Hotchkiss revolver cannon in 1880 British plural form of the word cannon.
- I don't know that that's specifically British.
- Damnit, I forgot that cannon could be American too.
- She left Kiel in mid-June 1871 for the first research trip Maybe link Kiel.
- Good catch
- training squadron. The ships were sent to Salonika Was this the official name of the city? Because the Thessaloniki article says that "Salonika" was written with a "c" and not a "k".
- It's an accepted spelling in English - see Thessaloniki#Names_and_etymology.
- she proceeded to Wilhelmshaven and then back through the Skagerrak Link Wilhelmshaven.
- Done
- and Skagerrak to Bergen, Norway. She then steamed south across Norway was part of the Union Sweden and Norway so maybe pipe it to it?
- Done
- She was sold in 1892 to a Hamburg-based company Link Hamburg.
- Done
- the ship was operated by the firm Paulsen & Ivers Is there a link to the firm Paulsen & Ivers?
- No, not that I'm aware of.
- but was lost with all hands on her first voyage as a merchant ship on 20 January 1894 Remove the "on 20" with "in".
- Done
- No edit wars.
Infobox
- No tonnes?
- Good catch
- No length of the long at the waterline?
- I usually only do the overall length in the box
- Link knots.
- Done
- Maybe add her renamed name in the infobox and the date or isn't that necessary?
- Added.
Images
- You have a great picture, hopefully, they'd become an FP. I can imagine that they'd be gorgeous.
- Unfortunately, it chops off the front of the ship, but it's all I've been able to find.
Sources
- Looks good to me.
- No OR.
- The sources are reliable and academic.
That's anything from me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 13:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks yet again! Parsecboy (talk) 12:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- Looks good to me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 17:31, 17 September 2019 (UTC)