Talk:SMS Bussard/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 22:17, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this article shortly.--Tomobe03 (talk) 22:17, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No duplicate links found in the article (no action required)
No disambiguation links found in the article (no action required)
Checklinks reports no problems with external links (no action required)
Copyvio detector reports no problems with the article (no action required)
Images:
- SMS Bussard Daressalam 1907-14.jpg should have US-PD licence in addition to the one already in the Commons
  - I'm on the wireless on campus and sometimes it gets screwy - for some reason, I can't open the file page. It'll have to wait until I get home.
    - Oh, it just opened. I've added the US tag. Parsecboy (talk) 14:06, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Is there a source for SMS Geier.jpg?
  - It's a user created image so no source is required.
    - How can one verify that's SMS Geier then? I mean, I assume it's needed per WP:V.--Tomobe03 (talk) 14:29, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      - There are line-drawings in Conway's and Gröner, and there are no problems with the drawing as far as I can tell. As far as I'm aware, sources are not required for user created images, since they are inherently interpretive. Parsecboy (talk) 14:35, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        That's nice, but it seems that WP:IUP Requirement #2 indeed requires a verifiable source. I'll accept the drawing as verifiable but not on the basis of another wiki article per WP:CIRCULAR. It would be verifiable per Bundesarchiv Bild 134-C0105, SMS "Geier", Kleiner Kreuzer.jpg as it seems to be a reliable source for the drawing, but I trust it would be prudent to add a link to the photo at the drawing page at the Commons as "additional information" or something, just to be on a safe side.--Tomobe03 (talk) 14:39, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- All other licencing/caption-related issues are in order (no action requried)
Referencing
- The article is fully referenced (no action required)
- Please add OCLC or ISSN numbers for the Journal of the Royal United Service Institution. I trust they may be found here and here
  - Both added.
No prose/MOS issues detected (no action required)

Nice article overall, with minor issues to address. Good work!--Tomobe03 (talk) 15:51, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I added the missing means of verification to the commons drawing of SMS Geier, so everything seems to be good to go! Congrats!--Tomobe03 (talk) 14:43, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]