Talk:SECI model of knowledge dimensions

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SECI model of knowledge dimensions article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Education Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

Just wondering, is the spiral going counter-clockwise is equivalent to going clockwise?

Need to review, While a lot of references of Nonaka's work are mentioned, mapping to exactly referenced article is unclear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.168.189.40 (talk) 17:07, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This model is related to KM, and is duly referenced in the knowledge management article, and if I had time -- anyone else care to? be my guest! -- I would insert mutual links and generally smooth the relationship between the two. Matt Whyndham (talk) 17:32, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]