Jump to content

Talk:Słupsk/Archives/2012/April

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


City population


source: Rocznik Statystyczny 1981, Główny Urząd Statystyczny, Warszawa 1981, Rok XLI
1960: 53.400 inhabitants
1970: 68.900 inhabitants
1975: 77.600 inhabitants
1980: 86.100 inhabitants

source: Mapa wojewodztwa koszalinskiego , Państwowe Przedsiębiorstwo Wydawnictw Kartograficznych, Warszawa 1972
1939: 48.200 inhabitants
1945: ca 7.000 inhabitants (inc. 800 Poles)
1950: 33.100 inhabitants
1960: 35.400 inhabitants
1970: 68.600 inhabitants

cc, 30 October 2003

Middle Pomerania

Slupsk is the capital of the region of Middle Pomerania????????? Since when? Always Koszalin was known as the Capital as the largest city of the region. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.203.46.156 (talk) 10:43, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Languages

What's Neo-pomeranian? I've heard about Pomeranian language (Słupsk in that language is Slepsko) and its dialect, kashubian (Słepsk), and also artifictial language of Le Pommeranais. So what is that third language? Maybe an author was thinking about Le Pommeranais? --Marie-Galante 14:09, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

In any case, there's no such thing as a Neo-Pomeranian language. And even if it's the artificial language Le Pommeranais, it doesn't belong in an article like this. —IJzeren Jan In mij legge alle fogultjes een ij 18:52, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
BTW, Le Pommeranais has been submitted for deletion here. —IJzeren Jan In mij legge alle fogultjes een ij 18:54, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

supermarkets

Is it really notable to mention the existence of Lidl, Netto and OBI Supermarkets? There are Pizzerias and Cafes too, but that's not something to mention at Wikipedia I think. Any Opponents? HerkusMonte (talk) 18:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Question

What does "Die urkundliche Uberlieferung Stolp" mean? Volunteer Marek (talk) 18:21, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

btw, wrt [1] there's no source which "contrasts" the two sources, hence framing the issue that way is improper. Volunteer Marek (talk) 18:27, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

This source also mentions the 1015 date I believe [2]. And this [3]; Gród słupski istniał już na początku IX wieku, a osada obok, jak przypuszczają archeolodzy, nawet wcześniej. Pierwsza wiadomość historyczna o Słupsku dotyczy roku 1015, tak przynajmniej datuje zdobycie Słupska przez Bolesława Chrobrego. Volunteer Marek (talk) 18:37, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

"Die urkundliche Überlieferung Stolp" means literally "the documented tradition of Stolp", i.e. Stolp tradition as recorded in historical documents (as relied on, it would seem, by Kratz). In contrast with oral history. (Not that documents are always to be preferred.) --Wikiain (talk) 22:46, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. Actually, the text is "Die urkundliche Uberlieferung uber Stolp" (I lost an uber there) - is that "the documented tradition of greater Stolp"? Volunteer Marek  23:43, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
No - "über" there means "about". --Wikiain (talk) 02:29, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Alternative names - either/or?

Alternative names are already included in the "Name" section, hence, following the apparent convention for naming on Eastern European places, there is no need to have the alternative names in the lede of the article. Or we could remove the Name section instead. Volunteer Marek (talk) 18:39, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Images caption

The caption to the images looks very odd. Correction? --Wikiain (talk) 20:29, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

B-class review failed

This article seems to almost have the major sections and sufficient referencing for B-class. It would need improvement in sections like economy and culture, which are poorly developed and unreferenced. It is not far, though. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 16:32, 15 July 2011 (UTC)