Jump to content

Talk:Ryti–Ribbentrop Agreement/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: PizzaKing13 (talk · contribs) 21:37, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


I'll go ahead and review this one. Something new and fresh from the normal topics I'm used to. PizzaKing13 (Hablame) 21:37, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

[edit]
  • checkY Add a comma after "President of Finland" in the type parameter.
  • checkY Add "the" between "with" and "resignation" in the expiration parameter.

Sections

[edit]

Lead

[edit]
Paragraph 1
  • Is there a reason for the Swedish translation being present?
    • It's an artifact of the original article, here presumably because Swedish is an official language in Finland. I'm rather ambivalent about it and wouldn't oppose removing it if you feel it's undue.
      • I don't think its necessary. Remove it.
  • Is there a German translation?
    • I don't recall seeing one in Finnish or English sources. There's an article in de.wiki, but I don't speak German so I can't really verify whether their title is use in the literature.
      • Fair. Leave it out then.
  • checkY Move the date the letter was composed to the end of the first sentence.
  • checkY Keep consistency with how the titles are presented, ie use "Finnish President Risto Ryti to German Führer Adolf Hitler" OR "President Risto Ryti of Finland to Führer Adolf Hitler of Germany". I personally think the first one is better.
  • checkY Change "out of the war" to "out of the Continuation War", and link Continuation War, since what war they were fighting wasn't mentioned.
Paragraph 2
  • checkY Add "the" between "where" and "Germans".
  • checkY Remove the link to the Continuation War, since it should be linked in the first paragraph.
Paragraph 4

Historical background

[edit]
Paragraph 1
  • checkY Change "going back to" to "dating back to" (more formal).
  • checkY Remove the comma in "secret to Germany, where they".
  • checkY Add "being" between "400 jägers" and "promoted". I'm pretty sure that's correct.
  • checkY Remove the comma in "Imperial German forces, who took part".
  • checkY Is there a page for the capture of Helsinki? If so, link it.
  • checkY Lowercase "jäger" in the last sentence.
Paragraph 2
  • checkY I know what "[Germanophilic] and [anti-communist, Russophobic] stances" is trying to say but it sounds awkward. You should break apart anti-communist and Russophobic. I'd suggest "Germanophilic, Russophobic, and anti-communist stances".
  • checkY Change "who had commanded" to "who commanded"
Paragraph 3
  • You should briefly mention why the Winter War started.
    • A classic case of "it's complicated". I'll look around for a short explanation in one of my sources.
  • checkY Add "The" before "British and French".
  • checkY Change "had come" to "came".
Paragraph 4
  • checkY Lowercase "northern" in "movements to Northern Norway".
Paragraph 5
  • checkY Lowercase "northern" in "operations in Northern Finland".
  • checkY Remove the comma in "Soviet Eastern Karelia, where they"
Paragraph 6
  • checkY Add "the" before "Soviet Air Force"
  • Are there specific targets in Finland where the Soviet Air Force struck?
    • I'll check the source.
  • That's fine.
  • checkY "bombing" → "bombings"
  • checkY "However, it soon became clear that the German forces" → "It soon became clear, however, that the German forces"
Paragraph 7

Negotiations

[edit]
Paragraph 1
  • checkY Add a comma between "back" and "especially"
  • checkY "with preparations being made for evacuating" → "and preparations were made to evacuate"
Paragraph 2
  • checkY Remove "OKW" and make "German High Command" to OKW
Paragraph 3
  • checkY Add a comma between "Niobe" and "were"
  • checkY Italicize Prinz Eugen and Niobe
Paragraph 4
  • checkY Remove "OKW" and capitalize "German High Command"
Paragraph 5
  • checkY Mention that Joachim von Ribbentrop was the minister of foreign affairs.
  • checkY "Ribbentrop's instructions were to force" → "Ribbentrop was instructed to force"
  • checkY Italicize Prinz Eugen and Admiral Hipper
Paragraph 6
  • checkY Is there a reason that "confessions" is translated into German?
    • Nothing beyond "this seems like a weird phrasing, original German might capture more nuance"; removed.
  • checkY "to Bulgaria. This information" → "to Bulgaria, and this information"
Paragraph 7
  • All good.
Paragraph 8
  • checkY "Ribbentrop as too vague" → "Ribbentrop as being too vague"
Paragraph 9

Final agreement

[edit]

Reactions and consequences

[edit]
Paragraph 1
  • "The socialist parties", what socialist parties?
    • I need to check the ref for this, but I thinkthat Jokisipilä is equally vague. I'll see if I can find something more definitive.
Paragraph 2
  • checkY Mention Nenye by his full name "Vesa Nenye"
  • checkY Same with Jokisipilä, "Markku Jokisipilä"
Paragraph 3

Finnish exit from the war

[edit]
Paragraph 1
  • checkY Mention that Keitel was the Chief of the German High Command
Paragraph 2

References and sources

[edit]

Images

[edit]
  • Jäger 27 Ostfront.jpg Green tickY
  • Baltic Sea Division in Helsinki 1918.jpg Green tickY
  • Road of life. 1941 December.jpg Green tickY
  • Hitler visit Finland 1942.jpg Green tickY
  • GERibbentrop.jpg Green tickY
  • Tali-Ihantala.jpg Green tickY
  • LapinSota.jpeg Green tickY

All images seem to be copyright compliant or be out of copyright entirely. Captioned appropriately. PizzaKing13 (Hablame) 22:01, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Overall

[edit]

Final remarks

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

@Ljleppan: Very well done on improving the article from what it was before September 2022. A rework like this is what I've been aiming for with various pages relating to Salvadoran topics. Most of what I'm suggesting are grammar related changes, so once that's done, I'll most likely go ahead and pass this article. PizzaKing13 (Hablame) 22:59, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PizzaKing13: Thank you for the very thorough comments! I'm currently traveling for a work related workshop but should be able to handle these in the next 48 hours or so. I'll mark simple CE things as done with an inline checkY and only comment if there's something more complex than "done" to say, if that's fine with you. I'll ping you in this thread once done. Ljleppan (talk) 07:15, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ljleppan: Alright, go ahead. PizzaKing13 (Hablame) 07:23, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As an update, I fixed (most?) of the smaller stuff. A few things require sourcing, which I'll do later today. Ljleppan (talk) 11:51, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@PizzaKing13: Mostly done now. See the note re: bombing targets in "Historical background" and the first two comments for Lead paragraph 1 for bits I'm a uncertain about. If you think some of the expanded parts are still too terse, let me know and I'll try to add a bit more detail. Ljleppan (talk) 07:39, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ljleppan: Responded. Let me know what that's done. PizzaKing13 (Hablame) 15:56, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@PizzaKing13: Done, let me know if I missed anything. Ljleppan (talk) 16:05, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ljleppan: Perfect. Very good job on this one! A very interesting read.I'll go ahead and pass this article now. PizzaKing13 (Hablame) 16:46, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.