Talk:Rutul people
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Population
[edit]In Azerbaijan there are more than 45.000 Rutuls. Today, total population of Rutuls in the world - more than 97 500 people. Where these huge numbers come from? Due to the official census in Azerbaijan SSR in 1989 there were 336 Rutuls. What is the source for such numbers? Bests, Ali-al-Bakuvi (talk) 18:18, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- Rutuls in Azerbajan - 17 000 (2000)[1].
- Azerbaijani government hostile to all indigenous peoples (except Azerbaijanis) of this region. Azerbaijan - is occupied lands of Rutul, Talysh, Udin and other peoples and appropriated the history of these nations. It is not surprising that Azerbaijan understates or ignores some number of minorities. Umar.Albani (talk) 07:16, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
References
Rename
[edit]This article should be renamed to Rutuls. Umar.Albani (talk) 07:16, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Rutul people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071010101456/http://atlas.musigi-dunya.az/atlas/az/rutuls_video.html to http://atlas.musigi-dunya.az/atlas/az/rutuls_video.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:40, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 22 June 2023
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Consensus that the proposed title is ambiguous with Rutuli (Italy). (closed by non-admin page mover) ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 14:21, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Rutul people → Rutulians – The name "Rutulians" is correct name for this people. Rutul is one of the villages where these people live (also, the question arises: how will we call the inhabitants of the village of Rutul?). This nationality is poorly studied not only by European and American specialists, but also by Russians, although their territory is included in Russia. What authoritative linguistic (ethnological) source is the name "Rutul people" based on? I have added sources to the name Rutulians, and this name is more correct, and more logical. Even if Google gives more results for the name "Rutul people", the name "Rutulians" is more accurate. This question should be discussed first of all by experienced linguists. The current situation with the name caused the creation of a disambiguation page with the name "Rutul", which adds even more confusion. Digitalberry (talk) 11:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Rutulians is ambiguous with Rutuli (Italy), Rutuls is an appropriate form for this people widely used in sources and should be the proposed title instead. Super Ψ Dro 10:58, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. I initially thought this was about the Rutulians of Ardea. Had to read carefully to make sure. Walrasiad (talk) 09:45, 26 June 2023 (UTC)