Talk:Rumex obtusifolius
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Rumex obtusifolius
[edit]I have put in numerous "citation needed" tags into the "Medicinal uses of the herb" (formally "Herbal use") section of the article on "Rumex obtusifolius". A lot of sweeping statements have been made without any references to medical research, alternative medicine or writings on folk medicine.QuestingVole 21:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
"detoxing effect on the liver and it cleanses the skin"
[edit]I added "according to folk remedies" because most Rumex species contain oxalic acid, [1], [2] and [3]. Though I cannot find a study which specifically states Rumex obtusifolius contains Oxalic acid, so I won't remove it all together. --Mark PEA 10:31, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Nettles
[edit]Wikipedia is contradicting itself when it says that dock leafs are an effective cure for Nettle Stings but says the opposite in the article on the Stinging nettle. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.19.88.202 (talk) 15:35, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- It doesn't exactly say that. It has a long list of assorted folk remedies and says that many of them are ineffective. To me many =/= all and dock are one of the ones that do work.MidlandLinda (talk) 20:01, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Rumex obtusifolius. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090429205753/http://www.glu.org/en/node/199 to http://www.glu.org/en/node/199
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:10, 3 January 2018 (UTC)