Talk:Rule Interchange Format

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Confusion

"Whereas ontologies describe distributed information onjects in a computer executable manner"

The meaning of this is lost on me...

- onjects = objects ?
- ontologies have to be distributed ?
- by executable do you mean it can be parsed or do you really mean it can be run by the operation system ?

Confused Bugone

I did a rewrite; hopefully this is clearer now. -- Beland (talk) 20:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update

RIF is now an official W3C Recommendation -- http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/REC-rif-core-20100622/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.184.157.233 (talk) 11:54, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please...

... have mercy on those who do not yet know what you are talking about. At least at the beginning of the article.

It would be nice to have at least the introductory sentence give you a faint idea what this article is talking about. A sentence like "The Rule Interchange Format (RIF) is a W3C Recommendation" which defines the article's subject by means of a link to somewhere in the middle of some other technical article is not very helpful. --84.190.85.67 (talk) 14:55, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Venn diagram

The article speaks of "the following Venn diagram", but there is none. One could delete this dangling reference, but perhaps someone can restore the Venn diagram? --Tillmo (talk) 10:31, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

aha, I see that the Venn diagram is contained in [5]. But this is not obvious. I suggest to copy the Venn diagram into the article (if the license admits, see https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2015/doc-license ) or else to redraw it. --Tillmo (talk) 11:03, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]