Talk:Rudolf Diesel/Archives/2015

Patent dates

I've added a link to the US patent office web page, which includes images of his original patents submitted to the office in 1895. In t,ki9,n8u9lnby7, Rudolf reviews all former patent applications and specifies the dates. This contradicts what is currently specified in this article.

jag är gangster

Diesel cheaper than gas?

"The diesel engine has the benefit of running on fuel which is less expensive then gasoline" It hasn't been in the US for a few years now, what shall we do about this part of the article? M855GT (talk) 08:00, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

My bad, I overwrote an edit that was accurate (Diesel is more fuel efficient)--Work permit (talk) 00:22, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

):):):):):) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.153.34.159 (talk) 09:27, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Just a moment...

Peanut oil, according to at least one reference cited in this very article (the hempcar.org one), was the fuel for the first working Diesel engine. I don't think that the article reflects this, as it goes so far as to say that the primary fuel for the Diesel engine is Petrodiesel, not mentioning that it was not so for about twenty years after the invention was first demonstrated successfully. [unsigned]

Actually, Rudolf Diesel invented his engine to run on vegetable oil, not peanut oil.

[In regard to first paragraph above] You might want to look at Diesels Patent applications. While there is a version that ran on coal dust there is Nothing about vegetable oil. The diesel cycle engine that ran on peanut oil at the 1900 Paris Exhibition was in the Otto Companies exhibit. (Dristen)

[In regard to second paragraph above, veg oil vs peanut oil] This is not true!(Dristen)

I would think Dristen is correct here, not only because of the points about coal dust, but also because I very much doubt that there is any differentiation chemically that matters between "vegetable oil" and "peanut oil" as regards using it as a fuel for combustion. Any engine that runs on corn oil or canola oil is going to run on peanut oil with little to no modification. They are all vegetable oils, peanut included. — ¾-10 17:44, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Death ideas from great niece

Can someone help me? I personally spoke with Christiana, Rudolf Diesel's great niece. She said he died in bed, that he protested diesel engines being used in war machines. Is there an expert out there whom I can speak with to get Christiana's information confirmed? She is private but will speak about these facts if able to speak to her great-uncle's protestations of using diesel engines in war. She lives in California. M RammageNyliramneaj (talk) 01:07, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

I think there is something wrong here

"Diesel began building a prototype engine, which was ready for testing by July 1893. The engine was fueled by powdered coal injected with compressed air. This machine, a single 10-foot(3 m) iron cylinder with a flywheel at its base, achieved a compression of 80 atmospheres (8100 kPa). After a nearly fatal explosion, the exploding ammonia engine was strictly limited by his boss Linde. Due to these imposed limits, the machine would not power itself, but it did prove that one did not need a spark to have internal combustion." Is "exploding ammonia engine" correct?

There is confusion here between two different engines. The ammonia engine was an external combustion engine. The coal dust engine was an internal combustion engine. I forget the timeline and details but Grosser's book mentions both efforts. — ¾-10 02:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

I see that the paragraph in question apparently has been fixed since the original note was written. — ¾-10 02:20, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

I think this was meant to be in the discussion section

Before you step off into Diesel's last few weeks of his life you must remember two things; there was only one thing Diesel cared enough about to die for; fuel efficiency. The second thing is; Diesel was working for Linde when he invented his engine; the engine may bear his name, but the legal position over who "owned" the Diesel engine is not at all simple.

Whatever happened in 1913 it has fit with the pattern of the man. Most of the speculations are people who either never knew Diesel, or didn't read the rest of the book.

There is an interesting element to this story that might be investigated; Diesel "disappeared in 1913" and Carl Benz launched the first Diesel truck "before World War 1"

Carl Benz had a vested interest in helping the oil industry dispose of the waste by-products left over from making petrol for their cars. Benz's partner Daimler had been technical director to Otto, and it was unlikely that Daimler would ditch the Otto engine for the Diesel.

But the Otto engine demanded highly refined fuels, and that fuel supply was a severe limit on the sales of their Otto engined cars. Benz needed a means to dispose of the waste, and the Diesel engine might be turned into an ideal waste disposal unit. A Diesel truck would be ideal. But the pure Diesel engine would be more than was required for waste disposal.

Because of the legal position with Linde, it may be possible that Benz could do a deal with Linde / MAN, behind Diesel's back; not involve Diesel, or even tell him; to simplify the Diesel engine to their own design and commercial ends.

If this was the case, such a resulting redesign would be too much for Diesel to bear; it would the destruction of his life's work to allow the Otto engine to waste more fuel, rather than save fuel. That would be a reason for him to jump off the ship.

There are suggestion that Diesel went mad, but consider the legal position; he may have been forbidden by his contracts with Linde to discuss any of this outside the company. Suddenly Diesel's mutterings of "secret enemies" is not madness, but simply terms of employment.

By all means consider the other speculations; but this is the nearest one that fits Diesel the man. The question can only be resolved if there is any documentary evidence of a deal between Benz and Linde; between 1912 and 1913, to change the specification of the Diesel engine, and without Rudolph Diesel's agreement. If such a deal took place, and researchers of Benz or Linde have seen documentary evidence; you may finally solve the puzzle of what really happened on the ship.

Back to the other speculations;

[Comment added by Northnomad on 2007-04-04. Abrupt cut-off at semicolon reflects original comment; it ended there.]

Early life

An unknown editor on the 7th March has wiped out a chunk of his early life, which was never reinstated. There is no harm in talking about his schooling in France, and his move to London. I shall reinstate this part of the story, which is interesting, and the article is not too long. The last three paragraphs here will fit better under the next heading.LouisBB (talk) 22:31, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Errors

2007

I think this section is gibberish:

"Diesel knew three rules on heat engine efficiency that the expansion of the gas was the key to fuel efficiency had limited the fuel efficiency of his engine. That was the key to Diesel's engine patents; he won his patent on the grounds of liberating the engine from limits to its fuel efficiency.

His answer was - only add the fuel when you want to ignite it. With that simple leap of thinking there is suddenly no mechanical limit to the theoretical efficiency."

1. What are these 3 rules?
2. All heat engines are limited in thermal efficiency by the Carnot cycle. The maximum theoretical thermal efficiency is related to the difference in the absolute temperatures of the working fluid at the beginning and end of the stroke. Biscuittin (talk) 21:47, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

No responses received, so I have removed the offending section. Biscuittin (talk) 17:40, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

2013

There is a 1990 in the text that should presumably be an 1890. Further, the word for peanut oil should be arachide, not arachnide.83.109.178.97 (talk) 22:55, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Fixed (1900; arachide), and ref added for the quote. — ¾-10 01:58, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Peanut Oil: probably Urban legend

The article reads:

Diesel was especially interested in using coal dust or vegetable oil as fuel, his engine in fact ran on peanut oil.

According to the German Article on Diesel, he was indeed interested in alternative fuels; however, the German version says that actual experiments with vegetable oils such as peanut ols are an urban legend. Such experiments would have been illogical, bevause peanut oil was at that time many times more expensive than mineral fuels.

Could someone check that? --82.113.121.16 (talk) (Joise) —Preceding comment was added at 21:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

There is also a discussion on this fact on the German article. And its told that the French article states that Diesel was using biofuel at the expo in 1900. Yet, they are all asking for proof. --7Piguine (talk) 09:16, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

The diesel cycle Engine that ran on Peanut oil at the 1900 Paris Exposition was in the Otto companies exhibit. They were asked by the French Government to build this engine because the French had colonies that grew peanut oil. Diesel included in his patent a version that ran on coal dust but none that ran on vegetable oil. Columbia had a successful graduate project that modified Lister engines (commonly used in the Third World) to run on SVO straight vegetable oil. The lead graduate student is now a professor there. [Dristen]

As an aside. Deutz switched to Diesel engines as soon as the patent expired and sold off Otto & Cie around 1917.Krontach (talk) 04:35, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Diesel's Nationality

Although Diesel spent most of his life working in Germany, he was born a Frenchman in Paris. There is no evidence that he ever changed his nationality and was thus French when he invented his engine. 20.133.0.13 (talk) 13:49, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

We need a source to claim whether he was legally a German or French national. The article on French nationality law seems to hint that in 1858 his birth in Paris, although to foreign parents, in itself would have given him French nationality. (Today it would not.) German nationality law back then would have viewed him as having German nationality. He therefore could have claimed both nationalities. (What relationship that would have to either French or German citizenship at that time is another question, one for lawyers to sort out.) Grosser (1978) states that Diesel was very proud to consider himself a cosmopolitan citizen of the world. Diesel would probably not enjoy reading about himself as either "a German inventor" or "a French inventor". He would have emphasized his work, not his nationality. Encarta calls him "German". Wikipedia really shouldn't call him either German or French without sourcing it. Maybe "French-born of German parents" is best, if putting his nationality in the lede is insisted upon. I would say, simply omit it from the lede. — ¾-10 01:24, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Update: We have had a good stable version of the nationality for a long while now ("Rudolf Christian Karl Diesel […] was a European inventor and mechanical engineer, famous for the invention of the diesel engine.") Additionally, the infobox has been stable as "Nationality: French and German (born in France of German parents)". I note here tonight that someone just tweaked that to "Nationality: French and Bavarian (born in France of Bavarian parents", and I fully agree with that improvement, because when Diesel was born in 1858, there was not yet a unified Germany. Good work everyone, and I commend Wikipedia for becoming more accurate on this topic than many other published sources, including Encarta and Britannica. — ¾-10 00:55, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Calling Diesel French and Bavarian (born in France of Bavarian parents) can only evolve out of Anti-German sentiment. First, how can he be called French when we can read in his biography that he and his family obviously due to their nationality were forced to leave France as a result of the outbreak of the Franco-Prussian War. Maybe he had a French passport but that did not make him French enough. Second, concerning his "Bavarian" nationality, surely Bavaria was an independent country at the time of his birth nearly 52 years after the dissolution of Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation. But still Bavaria is Germany and Bavarians are Germans. Just let me give you a counter example: Dante Alighieri's nationality is given on wikipedia as Italian even though Italy was not reunified during his lifetime and nobody gives a thought calling him Florentine due to his place of birth. 00:05, 11 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marawik (talk • contribs)

OK, I guess I follow that logic. The French and Bavarian idea had nothing to do with Anti-German sentiment; it just was based on the things discussed further above. But I can see your points though. I hadn't thought of it that way. I was focusing on the legal sense of nationality, but the cultural sense is just as important to social identity, and it's true that culturally he was viewed as German. OK, I guess I have to retract my criticism of Encarta and Britannica on this point. But I still think there's a big asterisk, figuratively speaking, on calling him "German" rather than "European" (I prefer the latter). However, I think the way to address it is to make a section in the article about his nationality and touch on these points. Regards, — ¾-10 03:16, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Diesel's test engine blew up

This is directed to some person who thought Diesel was working on a steam engine. The Encyclopedia Britannica says "Diesel planned to use compressed air to introduce the coal dust into the engine cylinder but found it difficult to control the rate of injection so that the maximum pressure of the cylinder would not exceed a safe limit. After the experimental engine was wrecked by and explosion in the cylinder, Diesel gave up the idea of using coal dust and devoted his efforts to the use of liquid petroleum... copyright 1979 Krontach (talk) 04:40, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Place of death

The infobox mentions "Died: the English Channel". Since the SS Dresden was travelling from Antwerp to Harwich, I find it hard to believe that it would pass through the English Channel since the English Channel clearly lies much to the south of the route Antwerp-Harwich. Shouldn't this be the North Sea rather than the Channel? Boerkevitz (talk) 20:56, 18 October 2013 (UTC)