Jump to content

Talk:Royal Canadian Regiment

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Afghanistan

[edit]

Created a separate section for this, as the mission is NOT peacekeeping.Mikedelsol 10:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually you will note that the section was NOT titled "Peacekeeping", there was no "Peacekeeping" section.

2nd Bn, The RCR

[edit]

The 2nd Battalion of The RCR has, over the years, been under the command of 2 CMBG and of 5 GBMC. Currently (2006-07) it is an independent battalion under Land Force Atlantic Area Headquarters (LFAA HQ). Sources:

  • [[1]] 2CMBG page listing units does not include 2RCR
  • [[2]] LFAA page listing units includes 2RCR
  • [[3]] Army page listing 2CMBG units does not include 2RCR
  • [[4]] Army page listing LFAA units does include 2RCR
  • [[5]] LFC Guide shows 2RCR as an independent unit under LFAA

Canadian Forces Organization Order - 1848 – Unclassified - 4 Nov 2002 – “In accordance with Ministerial Organization Order 93323, the Minister of National Defence has authorized the organization of 2 RCR, Dept ID 1848, as a unit of the Canadian Forces, embodied in the Regular Force, and allocated to Land Force Atlantic Area (LFAA)”

If 2RCR is to be listed as under command of 2CMBG, current references will be required. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.112.164.244 (talk) 15:36, 18 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Hi!

[edit]

Sorry if I just came out of no where, but I just want to help a little. First of all, when you're writing an article, on the discussion page, you add {{WikiProject Military history|class=B|b1=y|b2=y|b3=y|b4=y|b5=y|Canadian=yes|WWI=yes}} if it has anything to do with history, Canada, or World war I. P.S. you can change the yes or no when you like. Just put y for yes and n for no. Hope I helped a little! (Mrjeremister (talk) 20:22, 29 June 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Nicknames for RCR

[edit]

This is actually a complaint about the nicknames listed for the RCR on the main wikipedia page.

The references, especially the vulgar one, to chickens is uncalled for. Does Wikipedia tolerate foul nicknames for various nationalities or ethnic grops?

I'm a former armour officer (Royal Canadian Dragoons) who worked in the field with the RCR in Canada for a number of years in the late 80s. The nicknames listed are disrespectful to the regiment, and, most importantly, its dead and wounded.

Someone should please remove this. I am a new member and don't feel I have the esperience or the right to edit other people's comments, but whoever put those neicknames in there was not only mean spirited, but very ignorant as well. No one with any time in the Canadian Army would not recognize "Royals" as a nickname.

Someone please remove this,

Thank you, TSMEC (talk) 15:56, 16 June 2011 (UTC) Tim B Squadron, Royal Canadian Dragoons, 1988-1991[reply]

Regimental Slogan

[edit]

Regimental Slogan "Never Pass a Fault" should be added (under the motto?) on the sidebar to the right

thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.244.77.44 (talk) 13:09, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure "slogan" is the right term for it, but it should be there.Ab.chaplin (talk) 20:36, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.cmp-cpm.forces.gc.ca/dhh-dhp/his/ol-lo/vol-tom-3/par2/RCR-eng.asp. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:44, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 8 external links on The Royal Canadian Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:51, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on The Royal Canadian Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on The Royal Canadian Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kowang-san Day

[edit]
WP:SNOWCLOSE of seemingly resolved matter. Non-admin close . Pincrete (talk) 10:40, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I found that User:Footwiks keeps editing "Kowangsan Day" as holiday of this Regiment, but I think this is quite controversial to put whether this is actually right to put holiday which is not verified with any resources, so I want to hear other people's opinion. Wendylove (talk) 10:47, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

'Kowangsan Day" has existed since since 2008 version. Of course There is a perfect source.The Royal Canadian Regiment Official Website. What is the problem? Footwiks (talk) 17:42, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@웬디러비: Where is the WP:RFCBEFORE? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:41, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
See https://thercr.ca/upcoming-events/ or the museum description https://www.thercrmuseum.ca/en-ca/Past-Events Cheers Markbassett (talk) 01:28, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:The Fort Garry Horse which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 19:47, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Royal_Canadian_Regiment&oldid=1205120930"