Talk:Round-trip delay

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Telecommunications Mid‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

What does this mean and what does it have to do with the rest of the article

No longer in article ~Kvng (talk) 19:48, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Examples

   200 ms RTT for a connection using UDP-based Data Transfer Protocol equates to a 12,000 mile round trip path length.[citation needed]  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.84.1.2 (talk) 14:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

WikiProject Time assessment rating comment

Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving.
—Yamara ✉ 17:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Please see Talk:Response time for a discussion on a related article. I am not sure if the two are different enough to warrant two articles, or should be merged, and if merged, under what title. -- nae'blis 00:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

tcp rtt

No longer in article ~Kvng (talk) 19:48, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"In regards to TCP communication the RTT time is calculated from the 3-way handshake by measuring the time between segment transmission and ACK receipt." - this is no longer used, instead a smoothed rtt (running average) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.232.108.57 (talk) 22:01, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Copyediting for style

I've added a template for copyediting. The main problem is that it's simply a collection of one-line definitions for different domains. A notable symptom is that the article does not begin with a concise definition of the article title. Someone more knowledgeable with these definitions please help improve the style of this article. C xong (talk) 01:15, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it a bit and removed the copyedit template. The article still needs help, but it's no longer really a copyediting issue. P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 21:04, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"long fat pipes"

what?! 84.154.0.201 (talk) 12:48, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Network terminology. Sort of defined in previous sentence. I added a ref to help. ~Kvng (talk) 15:22, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]