Talk:Rough cut
 | The contents of the Editor's cut page were merged into Rough cut on 28 August 2024. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Original research?
[edit]The "Use in non-linear video editing" section seems a lot like either original research or a copy and paste job. It also doesn't give enough background information to make it relevant to the article or to someone unfamiliar with non-linear editing. I think the whole section should be rewritten.
- I'm not so certain. It certainly looks sloppy and needs a thorough cleanup, but nothing that I see written seems to be original research; I would presume that a copyvio can be easily googled for. In any case, it is worth pointing out that the article has issues and needs a lot of work. Girolamo Savonarola 20:02, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Fine cut
[edit]Many filmmakers also include a stage that they call the "Fine Cut" which fits roughly between the rough cut and the final cut. I'm only speaking from experience as a filmmaker myself here and don't want to get flagged for original research, so could someone source this out and write it in? 130.132.151.232 (talk) 21:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)