Talk:Editor's cut
Appearance
The contents of the Editor's cut page were merged into Rough cut on 28 August 2024 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Article necessary?
[edit]Does this warrant its own article? Are "editor's cuts" even common anymore, and are they called that? Isn't it more common to just call them a rough cut or assembly cut? Maybe this phrase should just be defined on the "Film Editing" article in one sentence and not have its own page.Henry chianski (talk) 15:16, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
These appear to refer to the same thing, but I don't know enough about filmmaking to be sure. Input from editors more knowledgeable in the topic area than I would be appreciated. ― novov (t c) 09:04, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support merge, as there is heavy overlap and they're both short; Rough cut looks more developed, so merging there would seem to be better. Klbrain (talk) 12:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 16:10, 28 August 2024 (UTC)