Talk:Rosa 'KORbin'

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Horticulture and Gardening Mid‑importance

	Gardening portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Horticulture and Gardening on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horticulture and GardeningWikipedia:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningTemplate:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningHorticulture and gardening articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Patented?

Presumably this was never patented but for those of who who are ignorant in such matters it would be an interesting section to add to the article. Alex McKee (talk) 23:34, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Answering my own question it wasn't patented, as I thought, but I'm having difficulty finding a decent source to cite. Alex McKee (talk) 23:59, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:46, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rosa 'Iceberg' → Rosa Iceberg — Iceberg is a trade name rather than the cultivar name (which is 'Korbin'); trade names should not be shown in quotes as per the article and the International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants, Article 17. The article title and the redirect at Rosa Iceberg need to be swapped. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:27, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

*Support. Lose the single quotes. Such quotes should be double if they are used at all. See WP:MOS. Noetica^Tea? 01:46, 25 November 2011 (UTC) [Withdrawn; see below.–N][reply]

Support. Cultivar names are always shown with single quotes, but the question is: Is Iceberg a cultivar name or a selling name? It appears that 'Korbin' [1] is the accepted cultivar name and Iceberg is a selling name [2][3] (and therefore shown without quotes), despite 'Iceberg' [sic] appearing in many texts. Melburnian (talk) 10:46, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah Melburnian, I have learned something. I withdraw my support above because I have no opinion on the matter. As a MOS specialist I will raise the matter of single quotes at WT:MOS, since I now see that this is a well-established exception that should be noted in WP:MOS. Thank you! Noetica^Tea? 19:15, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. --Melburnian (talk) 22:07, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

What's with the weird font? It makes it unsightly to read.

68.192.201.174 (talk) 20:00, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See the documentation at {{tdes}}. The International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants requires trade designations/selling names to be typeset in a different font to normal text and cultivar names. It's not clear how to do this best in Wikipedia; one of the choices is to use Comic Sans font – not ideal, but can you suggest a better solution? Peter coxhead (talk) 08:24, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]