This article was nominated for deletion on 24 June 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Ron Manners is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Ron Manners is within the scope of WikiProject Libertarianism, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Libertarianism and related subjects in the Wikipedia.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Sorry, but no. As you can see from the fully referenced article, he is a prominent businessman and libertarian advocate globally. Besides, I am extremely suspicious of an unregistered account trying to get articles deleted.Zigzig20s (talk) 15:01, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. The same editor who originally suggested this page for deletion as a "vanity page" has deleted some of Ron Manners's edited books. This does not look to me to be very neutral, or right.Zigzig20s (talk) 16:06, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Now they have also deleted his other books. Am I allowed to add them back, or should I just let unregistered accounts delete info?Zigzig20s (talk) 16:12, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator User:Number 57 has protected the page and asks me to ask if we should indeed keep the bibliography section. I vote YES, because it is good to know what books Ron Manners has written and seems relevant to this article, just as we list the books written by Jane Austen on her page, etc. I am not sure if anyone else will see this or vote. Have a nice day.Zigzig20s (talk) 12:13, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The books listing was restored by Number 57. The reason that IP gave for the inartful removal was invalid. IP said self-published books are not notable. This is a POV and not in keeping with WP practice. The standard for WP content is based on noteworthiness. – S. Rich (talk) 16:25, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Just for clarification, in case it wasn't obvious, I added the "primary sources" cleanup template because the majority of the article relies on Manners' various promotional online profiles i.e. at Mannkal (his company) and GLG (a professional networking business), which are used to cite almost everything. True, if there is an independent source that cites the same fact perhaps the online profile citation should be removed. Sionk (talk) 10:17, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting to see there is a "For more information click here" link on his Mannkal profile, which suggests he is using Wikipedia as an extension of his website. Sionk (talk) 10:26, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]